Measuring Anti-aging Effects in Drosophila

Materials and reagents

Biological materials

1. Oregon-R (Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, BDSC, Bloomington, IN, USA, #5)

2. Catalase heterozygous mutant flies (Catⁿ¹ mutant) (BDSC, catalog number: 4014) [20]

3. UAS-hr96-RNAi lines (Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center, VDRC, Vienna, Austria, catalog number: 330288, catalog number: 10958)

4. Myo1A-Gal80^ts flies, obtained from B.A. Edgar

5. Rat anti-GFP antibody (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan, catalog number: 04404-84)

6. Rabbit anti-phospho-histone H3 (PH3) (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, catalog number: 06-570)

7. Mouse anti-γ-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, catalog number: T6557-.2ML)

8. Goat anti-rat FITC antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, catalog number: 415-095-166)

9. Goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor^® 647 antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, catalog number: 305-605-003)

10. Goat anti-mouse Cy3 antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, catalog number: 205-165-108)

Reagents

1. EM-grade paraformaldehyde 16% aqueous solution (Electron Microscopy Science, catalog number: 15710)

2. 10× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Ambion, catalog number: AM9624)

3. Methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number: 67-56-1)

4. 10% Triton X-100 (Millipore, CAS number: 9036-19-5)

5. 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Molecular Probes, catalog number: D1306)

6. Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, catalog number: H-1000-10)

7. 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3, D1530 (VitD) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: D1530)

8. Ultra-pure water (Welgene Inc., catalog number: ML 019-02)

9. Propionic acid (Junsei Chemical Co., CAS number 79-09-4)

10. Butyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd., CAS number 94-26-8)

Solutions

1. Standard food (see Recipes)

2. Vitamin D food (VitD) (see Recipes)

3. Bokinin (see Recipes)

Recipes

1. Standard food

Reagent	Final concentration	Quantity or Volume
Sucrose	10% (w/v)	100 g
Cornmeal	7% (w/v)	70 g
Yeast	2% (w/v)	20 g
Agar	1% (w/v)	10 g
Propionic acid	0.5% (v/v)	5 mL
Bokinin	0.3% (v/v)	3 mL
Water	79.2% (v/v)	1 L

2. Vitamin D food (VitD)

Reagent	Final concentration	Quantity or Volume
10 mM Vitamin D	100 nM (v/v)	0.1 mL
Standard food	n/a	9.9 mL
Total	n/a	10 mL

3. Bokinin

Reagent	Final concentration	Quantity or Volume
Butyl 4-hydroxybenzoate	10% (v/v)	10 g
Ethanol	n/a	70 mL
Water	n/a	30 mL

Laboratory supplies

1. Microtube (Axygen, model: MCT-175-X)

2. Microscopic slides (Paul Marienfeld GmbH & CoKG, model: 31593)

3. Microscope cover glasses (24 × 32 mm, Deckglaser, model: HSU-0101172)

4. Tip 20 μL (Axygen, model: TF-20-RSm TF-200-R-S, TF-1000-R-S)

5. Vonetex latex gloves (Hartalega Sdn. Bhd.)

Equipment

1. Microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., model: Axioskop 2 Plus)

2. Aerobic incubator (Sanyo, model: MIR-254-PK)

3. Sigma Plot 14.5 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA)

4. Stereomicroscope with Axiocam 208 color camera (Zeiss, model: Stemi 508)

5. Fluorescent microscope with AxioCam MRm (Zeiss, model: Axioplan2)

6. Precision tweezer (Techni-Tool Tweezer Ni-Cr-Mo Superalloy, Type 5, Techni-Tool, Worcester, PA; catalog number: 33-04594-01)

7. Single orbital shaker (Daeil biotech., model: PM-6249)

Software and datasets

1. AxioVision Rel. 4.8 software (Carl Zeiss Inc.)

2. SigmaPlot 14.5 package (Systat, Software Inc., San Jose, California, USA)

Procedure

Below, we describe a step-by-step procedure for measuring the effects of anti-aging agents in adult intestinal stem cells using Drosophila midgut with temperature-controlled gene expression, immunochemistry, and feeding assays. All washing steps throughout the protocol are conducted with 800 μL unless stated differently.

A. Fly collection

1. Stock culture conditions: All Drosophila fly stocks were reared at 25 °C and provided with a standard cornmeal-molasses diet under a 12/12 light/dark (L:D) cycle. To avoid larval overpopulation in all vials, 50–60 adult flies per vial were transferred to new food vials every 2–3 d during their lifetime.

2. Genotypes of the flies used:

a. Myo^ts>GFP flies were obtained by crossing Myo1A-GAL4/CyO;UAS-GFP,tub-Gal80^ts/TM6B (Myo^ts) females and Oregon-R males.

b. Myo^ts>GFP+Catⁿ¹ flies were obtained by crossing Myo^ts females and Catⁿ¹ mutant males.

c. Myo^ts>GFP+hr96Ri flies were obtained by crossing Myo^ts females and UAS-hr96Ri (#330288 or #10958) males.

The Gal80ts technique was used for hr96 knockdown, an orthologous to human VDR, at specific developmental stages and tissues [21]. The experimental flies were housed at 22 °C until adulthood. For the collection of young adults, we used 1–3-day-old flies that were transferred to an environment at 29 °C for 45 days to activate the GAL4/Gal80 system, and UAS-RNAi was used for gene knockdown. For more details regarding the GAL4/GAL80 system, see [22,23]. The results described herein were obtained using female flies.

B. Aging and age-related condition induction

1. Aging conditions: Transfer 1-day-old Myo^ts>GFP flies to 29 °C for 45 days to induce aging.

2. Age-related condition: Transfer 1-day-old Myo^ts>GFP+Catⁿ¹ and Myo^ts>GFP+hr96Ri flies to 29 °C for 10 days to induce age-related conditions (Catalase mutant).

C. Vitamin D feeding

To measure the anti-aging effects of VitD, treat 3-day-old Myo^ts>GFP, Myo^ts>GFP+Catⁿ¹, and Myo^ts>GFP+hr96Ri or 38-day-old Myo^ts>GFP flies with 100 nM VitD [16,24] in standard food media for 7 days at 29 °C in the dark (Figure 1). Transfer the flies to new food vials every two days.

Figure 1. Process of administering vitamin D. Three-day-old Myo^ts>GFP, Myo^ts>GFP+Catⁿ¹, and Myo^ts>GFP+hr96Ri or 38-day-old Myo^ts>GFP flies were treated with 100 nM VitD in standard food for 7 days at 29 °C in the dark.

D. Gut dissection

To dissect the intact whole gut for immunostaining, anesthetize adult flies using carbon dioxide. Carefully remove the head of the flies using anatomical forceps, slightly grab the thorax, and carefully pull the posterior end of the abdomen to take the intact midgut from the crop to the rectum (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Whole gut dissection for immunostaining. Ten-day-old Myo^ts>GFP, Myo^ts>GFP+Catⁿ¹, and Myo^ts>GFP+hr96Ri or 45-day-old Myo^ts>GFP flies were dissected using forceps in a hole slide glass with 1× PBS. Ten entire intact guts were placed in a microtube (1.5 mL) containing 1×PBS on ice, followed by immediate fixation.

E. Fixation

1. Dissect the entire intact adult gut on ice.

2. Fix whole guts for 30 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1× PBS on a single orbital shaker in the dark.

3. Subsequently, dehydrate them for 5 min in 50%, 75%, 87.5%, and 100% methanol in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1× PBS and rehydrate for 5 min in 50%, 25%, and 12.5% methanol in 1× PBST (1 × PBS + 0.1% triton X-100).

4. Then, wash them thrice for 20 min with 1× PBST.

F. Immunochemistry

The procedure described below was used for immunostaining using anti-PH3 (1:1,000), ant-γ-tubulin (1:1,000), and anti-GFP (1:1,000) antibodies, which revealed that the number of centrosomes in dividing ISCs increased with age. Generally, two centrosomes were detected in the mitotic ISCs of 10-day-old Myo^ts>GFP, but mitotic ISCs with more than two centrosomes were also observed in 45-day-old Myo^ts>GFP (Figure 3).

1. Incubate samples overnight with the primary antibodies at 4 °C in 1× PBST.

2. Wash them thrice for 20 min with 1× PBST.

3. Incubate the samples at 25 °C for 1 h with the secondary antibodies and DAPI (nucleus, 1:1000) in 1× PBST.

4. Wash the guts again thrice for 20 min with 1× PBST.

5. Mount the samples using Vectashield.

6. Analyze the samples using an Axioskop 2 Plus microscope.

7. Count the number of PH3⁺ cells with centrosomes (≤2 or ≥ 3) in the whole midgut.

Figure 3. Age-related increase in centrosome amplification (CA) in Drosophila midgut intestinal stem cells (ISCs). The gut from 10-day-old (left panels) and 45-day-old (right panels) Myo^ts>GFP were stained with anti-PH3 (white), ant-γ-tubulin (red), and anti-GFP (green) antibodies and DAPI (blue). The original magnification is 400×.

Data analysis

Cells were counted throughout the gut for the quantitative analysis of PH3⁺ cells. To quantitatively analyze centrosome amplification, the number of γ-tubulin-stained spots per PH3⁺ cell in the whole midgut was determined (Table 1). We counted the number of PH3⁺ cells in the entire midgut and quantified the frequencies of these mitotic ISCs by centrosome amplification (CA, >2), as shown in Figure 4. Quantified data are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Significant differences were determined using the Student’s t-test. Sigma Plot 14.5 was used to analyze standard errors [14].

Figure 4. Age and age-related increases in PH3⁺ cell number and centrosome amplification (CA) in Drosophila midgut intestinal stem cells (ISCs). The gut from 10-day-old Myo^ts>GFP, 45-day-old Myo^ts>GFP (age condition), 10-day-old Myo^ts>GFP+Catⁿ¹ (age-related condition), and 10-day-old Myo^ts>GFP+Hr96Ri (age-related condition) were stained with anti-PH3 (white), ant-γ-tubulin (red), and anti-GFP (green) antibodies and DAPI (blue). Cells were counted throughout the gut for the quantitative analysis of the number of PH3⁺ cells and γ-tubulin-stained spots per PH3⁺ cell in the whole midgut.

Validation of protocol

This protocol was used to measure anti-aging effects in Drosophila adult intestinal stem cells in the following research articles:

1. Park et al. [16]. The anti-aging effect of vitamin D and vitamin D receptor in Drosophila midgut. Aging (Albany NY). (Figures 3A, B and 6A–D).

2. Park et al. [17]. Age and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage in Drosophila intestinal stem cells as marked by GammaH2AX. Exp Gerontol. (Figure 1A–C).

3. Na et al. [13]. Mechanism of metformin: inhibition of DNA damage and proliferative activity in Drosophila midgut stem cell. Mech Ageing Dev. (Figures 1–3).

4. Park et al. [14]. Increased centrosome amplification in aged stem cells of the Drosophila midgut. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun. (Figures 1 and 2).

5. Na et al. [15]. Metformin inhibits age-related centrosome amplification in Drosophila midgut stem cells through AKT/TOR pathway. Mech Ageing Dev. (Figures 1, 2B–D, and 3A, C).

6. Park et al. [5]. Deficiency in DNA damage response of enterocytes accelerates intestinal stem cell aging in Drosophila. Aging (Albany NY). (Figure 3B).

7. Park et al. [19]. Anti-Aging Effect of the Ketone Metabolite β-Hydroxybutyrate in Drosophila Intestinal Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci. (Figures 1 and 2).

General notes and troubleshooting

General notes

1. The Drosophila gut used in the experiment must be dissected intact from the crop to the rectum (including the Malpighian tubules). Even a slight wound during gut dissection can cause intestinal stem cell division, increasing the number of PH3⁺ cells throughout the gut.

2. Drosophila gut dissection must be performed as quickly as possible; in this study, the dissection time per experiment was within 30 min.

3. In aging studies, it is important to maintain constant adult fly growth conditions. In particular, it is important to maintain temperature, humidity, and food intake.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1: Weak γ-tubulin signal.

Possible causes: γ-tubulin signal is very small.

Solution: It is easier to first check the PH⁺ cells and then count the abundance of γ-tubulin in the cells at a higher microscope magnification.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (RS-2023-00243729). We thank Bio-Render for providing the graphical overview.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

1. Rando, T. A. (2006). Stem cells, ageing and the quest for immortality. Nature. 441(7097): 1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04958
2. Spradling, A., Drummond-Barbosa, D. and Kai, T. (2001). Stem cells find their niche. Nature. 414(6859): 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/35102160
3. Park, J. S., Kim, Y. S. and Yoo, M. A. (2009). The role of p38b MAPK in age-related modulation of intestinal stem cell proliferation and differentiation in Drosophila. Aging (Albany NY). 1(7): 637–651. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100054
4. Park, J. S., Na, H. J., Pyo, J. H., Jeon, H. J., Kim, Y. S. and Yoo, M. A. (2015). Requirement of ATR for maintenance of intestinal stem cells in aging Drosophila. Aging (Albany NY). 7(5): 307–318. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100743
5. Park, J. S., Jeon, H. J., Pyo, J. H., Kim, Y. S. and Yoo, M. A. (2018). Deficiency in DNA damage response of enterocytes accelerates intestinal stem cell aging in Drosophila. Aging (Albany NY). 10(3): 322–338. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101390
6. Na, H. J., Pyo, J. H., Jeon, H. J., Park, J. S., Chung, H. Y. and Yoo, M. A. (2018). Deficiency of Atg6 impairs beneficial effect of metformin on intestinal stem cell aging in Drosophila. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 498(1): 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.191
7. Tauc, H. M., Rodriguez-Fernandez, I. A., Hackney, J. A., Pawlak, M., Ronnen Oron, T., Korzelius, J., Moussa, H. F., Chaudhuri, S., Modrusan, Z., Edgar, B. A., et al. (2021). Age-related changes in polycomb gene regulation disrupt lineage fidelity in intestinal stem cells. eLife. 10: e62250. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.62250
8. Rodriguez-Fernandez, I. A., Tauc, H. M. and Jasper, H. (2020). Hallmarks of aging Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Mech Ageing Dev. 190: 111285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2020.111285
9. Jiang, H., Patel, P. H., Kohlmaier, A., Grenley, M. O., McEwen, D. G. and Edgar, B. A. (2009). Cytokine/Jak/Stat Signaling Mediates Regeneration and Homeostasis in the Drosophila Midgut. Cell. 137(7): 1343–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.014
10. Ohlstein, B. and Spradling, A. (2007). Multipotent Drosophila Intestinal Stem Cells Specify Daughter Cell Fates by Differential Notch Signaling. Science. 315(5814): 988–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136606
11. Choi, N., Kim, J., Yang, D., Kim, Y. and Yoo, M. (2008). Age‐related changes in Drosophila midgut are associated with PVF2, a PDGF/VEGF‐like growth factor. Aging Cell. 7(3): 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00380.x
12. Lee, W. C., Beebe, K., Sudmeier, L. and Micchelli, C. A. (2009). Adenomatous polyposis coliregulatesDrosophilaintestinal stem cell proliferation. Development. 136(13): 2255–2264. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.035196
13. Na, H. J., Park, J. S., Pyo, J. H., Lee, S. H., Jeon, H. J., Kim, Y. S. and Yoo, M. A. (2013). Mechanism of metformin: Inhibition of DNA damage and proliferative activity in Drosophila midgut stem cell. Mech Ageing Dev. 134(9): 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2013.07.003
14. Park, J. S., Pyo, J. H., Na, H. J., Jeon, H. J., Kim, Y. S., Arking, R. and Yoo, M. A. (2014). Increased centrosome amplification in aged stem cells of the Drosophila midgut. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 450(2): 961–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.06.085
15. Na, H. J., Park, J. S., Pyo, J. H., Jeon, H. J., Kim, Y. S., Arking, R. and Yoo, M. A. (2015). Metformin inhibits age-related centrosome amplification in Drosophila midgut stem cells through AKT/TOR pathway. Mech Ageing Dev. 149: 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2015.05.004
16. Park, J. S., Na, H. J. and Kim, Y. J. (2024). The anti-aging effect of vitamin D and vitamin D receptor in Drosophila midgut. Aging (Albany NY). 16: e205518. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.205518
17. Park, J. S., Lee, S. H., Na, H. J., Pyo, J. H., Kim, Y. S. and Yoo, M. A. (2012). Age- and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage in Drosophila intestinal stem cells as marked by Gamma-H2AX. Exp Gerontol. 47(5): 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2012.02.007
18. Na, H. J., Sung, M. J. and Park, J. S. (2024). Age- and oxidative stress-induced centrosome amplification and renal stones in Drosophila Malpighian tubules. Biol Open. 13(12): e061743. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.061743
19. Park, J. S. and Kim, Y. J. (2020). Anti-Aging Effect of the Ketone Metabolite β-Hydroxybutyrate in Drosophila Intestinal Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 21(10): 3497. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103497
20. Griswold, C. M., Matthews, A. L., Bewley, K. E. and Mahaffey, J. W. (1993). Molecular characterization and rescue of acatalasemic mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 134(3): 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/134.3.781
21. McGuire, S. E., Roman, G. and Davis, R. L. (2004). Gene expression systems in Drosophila: a synthesis of time and space. Trends Genet. 20:384–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.012
22. Salmeron, J. M., Leuther, K. K. and Johnston, S. A. (1990). GAL4 mutations that separate the transcriptional activation and GAL80-interactive functions of the yeast GAL4 protein. Genetics. 125(1): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/125.1.21
23. Brand, A. H. and Perrimon, N. (1993). Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 118(2): 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.118.2.401
24. Halicka, H. D., Zhao, H., Li, J., Traganos, F., Studzinski, G. P. and Darzynkiewicz, Z. (2012). Attenuation of constitutive DNA damage signaling by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Aging (Albany NY). 4(4): 270–278. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100450