Published: Vol 8, Iss 6, Mar 20, 2018 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2763 Views: 33801
Reviewed by: Modesto Redrejo-RodriguezAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Stationary-phase Mutagenesis Soft-agar Overlay Assays in Bacillus subtilis
Karla Viridiana Castro-Cerritos [...] Mario Pedraza-Reyes
Dec 5, 2017 6841 Views
Multiple Stepwise Gene Knockout Using CRISPR/Cas9 in Escherichia coli
Enrico König [...] Guido Grandi
Jan 20, 2018 27256 Views
Comprehensive Mapping of EZ-Tn5 Transposon Insertion Sites in Pseudomonas argentinensis SA190 Using RATE-PCR
Büsra Elkatmis [...] Maged M. Saad
Jul 20, 2025 807 Views
Abstract
The Microbial mutagenicity Ames test is a bacterial bioassay accomplished in vitro to evaluate the mutagenicity of various environmental carcinogens and toxins. While Ames test is used to identify the revert mutations which are present in strains, it can also be used to detect the mutagenicity of environmental samples such as drugs, dyes, reagents, cosmetics, waste water, pesticides and other substances which are easily solubilized in a liquid suspension. We present the protocol for conducting Ames test in the laboratory.
Keywords: MutagenicityBackground
The Microbial Ames test is a simple, rapid and robust bacterial assay consisting of different strains and applications of Salmonella typhimurium/E. coli, used for ascertaining the mutagenic potential (Levin et al., 1982; Gupta et al., 2009). In 1975, Ames and his followers standardized the traditional Ames assay protocol and reappraised in 1980’s (Maron and Ames, 1983). Induction of new mutations replacing existing mutations allows restoring of gene function. The newly formed mutant cells are allowed to grow in the absence of histidine and form colonies, hence this test is also called as ‘Reversion assay’ (Ames, 1971). While traditional Ames test is quite laborious and time consuming for initial monitoring of mutagenic compounds, miniaturization of liquid suspension significantly impacted the usability by making it more convenient. The standard doses (2 µl, 5 µl, 10 µl, 50 µl and 100 µl) were set to evaluate the mutagenicity from lower to higher concentration (Hayes, 1982). Mice liver has been used as a tissue for preparing homogenate 9,000 x g (S9 hepatic fraction) whereas in S9 mix, hepatocytes are used to minimize the mammalian metabolic activation formed in the mice liver. In Ames bioassay, the sensitivity of a compound for mutagenicity is based on the knowledge that a substance which is mutagenic in the presence of liver enzymes metabolizing compound might be a carcinogen (Mathur et al., 2005).
Genetic Approach: The Salmonella/E. coli tester strains: Several strains of Salmonella typhimurium have been used in Ames assay which requires histidine synthesis to assess the mutagenicity. In the histidine operon, each tester strain contains a different mutation. In addition to the histidine mutation, the standard tester strain of Salmonella typhimurium contains other mutations that greatly enhance their ability to detect the mutations (Figure 1). One of the mutations (rfa) causes partial loss of the lipopolysaccharides barrier that coats the surface of the bacteria and increases permeability to large molecules such as benzo[a]pyrene allowing not to penetrate in the normal cell wall (Mortelman and Zeiger, 2000). The mutagens present in the tested samples give rise to induced revertants on a minimal medium (absence of histidine). They are further used to observe revertants in previously mutated strains (that are not able to grow in a medium without histidine). The other mutation (uvrB) is a deletion mutation in which deletion of a gene, coding for the DNA excision repair system, causing gradually increased sensitivity in detecting many mutagens (Ames et al., 1973a). The reason behind this mutation is the deletion excising the uvrB gene emulsifying these bacteria requiring biotin for growth. The standard strains such as TA 97, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 contain the R-factor plasmid, pKM101. These R-factor strains are reverted by a number of mutagens that are detected weakly or not at all with the non R-factor parent strains (Ames et al., 1975a).
Figure 1. Genetic approach for assessing the mutagenicity in Salmonella strains (modified from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ames_test)
Many studies (Ames et al., 1975b; Levin et al., 1982) revealed that development of plasmid pKM101 in TA 1535 and TA 1538 strains leads to complement other isogenic strains such as TA 98, TA 100, TA 104 and TA 102. The his G46 mutation in TA 100 and TA 1535 codes for the first enzyme of histidine biosynthesis (hisG) (Ames et al., 1975b). This mutation, determined by DNA sequence analysis, substitutes proline (-GGG-) for leucine (-GAG-) in the wild type organism (Barnes et al., 1982). The tester strains TA 1535 and its R-factor derivative present in TA 100, detect mutagens which causes base-pair substitutions generally at one of these G-C pairs. The hisD3052 mutation in TA 1538 and TA 98 is in the hisD gene coding for histodinol dehydrogenase. TA 1538 and its R-factor derivative TA 98 detect various frameshift mutagens in repetitive sequences as ‘hot spots’ resulting in a frame shift mutation (Walker and Dobson, 1979; Shanabruch and Walker, 1980) (Table 1).
Table 1. Genotype of the Salmonella strain used for mutagenesis testing
Levin et al. (1982) described a standard strain Salmonella typhimurium bacterium called TA 102 which was used to evaluate the effect of some compounds reacting with nucleotides AT. Tester strain TA102 containing nucleotides AT, present in hisG gene carrying plasmid pAQ1. There are certain mutagenic agents which are detected by TA 102 but not by TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 (Wilcox et al., 1990). Before performing experiment, a new set of fresh strains are prepared; and the genotypes are assessed (R-factor, His, rfa and uvrB mutations). For these, we refer readers to many excellent reviews (Walker, 1979; Czyz et al., 2002; Fluckiger-Isler et al., 2004).
Certain carcinogens present in active forms in biological reaction are easily catalyzed by cytochrome-P450. Metabolic activation system is absent in Salmonella, and in order to improve the potentiality of bacterial test systems, liver extracts of Swiss albino mice are used. This serves as a rich source in converting carcinogens to electrophilic chemicals that are incorporated to detect in vivo mutagens and carcinogens (Garner et al., 1972; Ames et al., 1973a). The crude liver homogenate as 9,000 x g S9 fraction contains free endoplasmic reticulum, microsomes, soluble enzymes and some cofactors set with S9 concentration to 10% (Franz and Malling, 1975). The oxygenase requires the reduced form of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NADP) which is generally in situ by the action of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and reducing NADP both work as cofactors in assay (Prival et al., 1984; Henderson et al., 2000). While water is considered as a negative control, sodium azide, 2-nitrofluorine and mitomycin for TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 without S9 metabolic activation and 2-anthramine with S9 hepatic fraction are used as positive controls for conducting the test (Table 2). Before performing the experiment, fresh solutions must be prepared.
Table 2. Positive controls with and without S9 metabolic activation (DeFlora et al., 1984)
Spontaneous Reversion Control: Each strain of Salmonella contains a specific mutant range. Selection of solvents shows the effect on the frequency range of spontaneous mutant (Maron and Ames, 1983) (Table 3). The range of revertants varies in research laboratories. The spontaneous revertants are visible through unaided eyes (Figure 2).
Table 3. Spontaneous revertants control values for various strain types and number of revertants (Mortelmans and Stocker, 1979)
Figure 2. Spontaneous revertants colonies obtained after addition of waste water from health center in Salmonella mutagenicity assay at different concentrations, viz. 2 µl, 10 µl, 50 µl, 100 µl (Vijay, 2014)
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
Data analysis
Non-statistical analysis
The most widely used method for non-statistical analysis of result in Ames test is ‘two-fold rule’ described by Mortelmans and Zeiger (2000) and Morino-Caniello and Piegorsch (1996). On the basis that the increase in the number of revertant colonies, the concentration of the tested sample goes up (dose-dependent manner), mutagenicity ratio (MR) is calculated first by counting the number of revertant colonies per plate and then calculating the MR as described by Maron and Ames (1983) using the formula below (see Sample data below for results):
Sample data
Medical liquid waste was collected from different health care premises of Jaipur city. Salmonella mutagenicity test was performed on all the samples in their crude natural state using the plate incorporation procedure described by Maron and Ames, 1983. The results of Salmonella mutagenicity assay was analyzed through Mutagenicity Ratio method and shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Mutagenicity ratios of S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100 and TA102 treated with waste water from different health premises (Vijay, 2014)
+Mutagenicity Ratio > 2.0 imply mutagenic, -Ratio < 2.0 imply non-mutagenic
Conclusion
The Ames test is a widely accepted bacterial assay to detect the mutagenicity in pathogenic bacteria. In this protocol, although we have shown the step wise methodology to perform Ames assay applicable for three strains, this method can be used for studying all compounds to infer mutagenicity. Whereas the Ames assay experiments involve sterile measures, care must be taken in ensuring the sample/plasmid is not contaminated. The improved methods to detect the genotoxicity of compounds help us troubleshoot methods for studying the compounds tested in clinical trials.
Notes
Sterilization (safety considerations while working with Salmonella)
Limitations
Ames assay consists of Salmonella typhimurium strains and so it is not a perfect model for human. Mice liver S9 hepatic fraction is used to minimize the mammalian metabolic activations formed in the hepatic system so that the mutagenicity of metabolites can be assessed. There are several differences between human and mice metabolism which can affect the mutagenicity of testing substances. Major disadvantages of fluctuation test is slower and slightly more laborious than Ames protocol. The test is primarily used for testing aqueous samples containing low levels of mutagen and therefore, this test is well adapted for evaluating the mutagenicity of wastewater samples.
Recipes
Ingredients | Per 500 ml |
Warm distilled H2O (45 °C) | 335 ml |
Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4·7H2O) | 5 g |
Citric acid monohydrate | 50 g |
Potassium phosphate, dibasic (anhydrous) (K2HPO4) | 250 g |
Sodium ammonium phosphate (NaNH4HPO4·4H2O) | 87.5 g |
Ingredients | Per 125 ml |
D-Biotin (F.W. 247.3) | 15.45 mg |
L-Histidine·HCl (F.W. 191.7) | 12.0 mg |
Distilled H2O | 125 ml |
Ingredients | Per 250 ml |
Potassium chloride (KCl) | 30.75 g |
Magnesium chloride (MgCl2·6H2O) | 20.35 g |
Distilled H2O to final concentration of | 250 ml |
Ingredients | Per 250 ml |
0.2 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4·H2O) | 30 ml (6.9 g/250 ml) |
0.2 M disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4) | 220 ml (7.1 g/250 ml) |
Ingredients | Per 2.5 ml |
NADP | 191.5 mg |
Sterile distilled H2O | 2.5 ml |
Ingredients | Per 5 ml |
Glucose-6-phosphate (G-6-P) | 1.41 g |
Sterile distilled H2O | 5 ml |
Ingredients | Per 500 ml |
Ampicillin trihydrate | 0.4 g |
Sodium hydroxide (0.02 N) | 50 ml |
Ingredients | Per 500 ml |
Crystal violet | 0.05 g |
Distilled H2O | 50 ml |
Ingredients | Per 500 ml |
Agar | 7.5 g |
Distilled H2O | 465 ml |
50x VB salts (Recipe 1) | 10 ml |
40% glucose | 25 ml |
Ingredients | Per 500 ml |
Agar | 7.5 g |
Distilled H2O | 457 ml |
50x VB salts | 10 ml |
40% glucose | 25 ml |
Sterile histidine (2 g per 400 ml H2O) | 5 ml |
Sterile 0.5 mM biotin | 3 ml |
Ingredients | Per 500 ml |
Agar | 7.5 g |
Distilled H2O | 405 ml |
50x VB salts | 10 ml |
40% glucose | 25 ml |
Sterile histidine (2 g per 400 ml H2O) | 5 ml |
Sterile 0.5 mM biotin | 3 ml |
Sterile ampicillin solution (8 mg/ml 0.02 N NaOH) | 1.58 ml |
*Sterile tetracycline solution (8 mg/ml 0.02 N HCl) | 0.125 ml |
Ingredients | Per 500 ml |
Nutrient agar | 7.5 g |
Distilled H2O | 500 ml |
Ingredients | Standard S9 mix Per 25 ml |
Mice liver | 1.0 ml (2%) |
MgCl2-KCl salts | 0.5 ml |
1 M glucose-6-phosphate | 0.125 ml |
0.1 M NADP | 1.0 ml |
0.2 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 | 12.5 ml |
Sterile distilled H2O | 9.86 ml |
Ingredients | Per ml |
Sodium azide | 10 µg |
Autoclave distilled H2O | 990 µl (to make a total volume of 1 ml) |
Ingredients | Per ml |
2-Nitrofluroine | 10 µg |
Autoclave distilled H2O | 990 µl (to make a total volume of 1 ml) |
Ingredients | Per ml |
Mitomycin | 10 µg |
Autoclave distilled H2O | 990 µl (to make a total volume of 1 ml) |
Ingredients | Per ml |
2-Anthramine | 10 µg |
Autoclave distilled H2O | 990 µl (to make a total volume of 1 ml) |
Acknowledgments
Urvashi Vijay would like to thank the Department of Zoology, The IIS University, Jaipur where the work was carried out. The financial help received by IISU Fellowship 2012/9389 to Urvashi Vijay is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interests: None declared.
Authors contributions: Urvashi Vijay, Sonal Gupta, Priyanka Mathur carried out the protocol and the methods under the guidance of Pradeep Bhatnagar. Prashanth Suravajhala re-reviewed the works and proofread the manuscript before all authors approving it.
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2018 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Vijay, U., Gupta, S., Mathur, P., Suravajhala, P. and Bhatnagar, P. (2018). Microbial Mutagenicity Assay: Ames Test. Bio-protocol 8(6): e2763. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2763.
Category
Microbiology > Microbial genetics > Mutagenesis
Molecular Biology > DNA > DNA damage and repair
Cell Biology > Cell isolation and culture > Cell growth
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link