Published: Vol 8, Iss 2, Jan 20, 2018 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2671 Views: 10626
Reviewed by: Khyati Hitesh ShahAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Protocol for Measuring Free (Low-stress) Exploration in Rats
Wojciech Pisula and Klaudia Modlinska
Jan 20, 2020 3591 Views
Operant Vapor Self-administration in Mice
Renata C. N. Marchette [...] Khaled Moussawi
May 20, 2021 3543 Views
Construction of Activity-based Anorexia Mouse Models
Maria Consolata Miletta and Tamas L. Horvath
Aug 5, 2023 970 Views
Abstract
Experimental animal models are unique tools (i) to study pain transmission and pathophysiology of neuropathic pain, (ii) to identify novel molecular targets and (iii) to test the potential analgesic effect of specific molecules. The chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain is the first model of post-traumatic painful peripheral neuropathy, originally developed by Bennett and Xie in the late 1980s. The chronic constriction is performed in the sciatic nerve and induces a partial denervation involving myelinated afferent axons and unmyelinated axons. Damage to unmyelinated axons is much more severe than myelinated afferents. As the model induces a partial denervation, it is very useful for the analysis of pain behaviours. Stimulation of the hind paw, a target of the sciatic nerve, induces pain which can be quantitated. Thus, mechanical allodynia is usually assessed 7, 14 and 21 days after CCI of the sciatic nerve by measuring the hind paw withdrawal response to von Frey filament stimulation. Here, we describe in detail the protocol allowing a reliable and reproducible CCI model in mice. Overall, researchers most commonly use this surgical model to discover more efficacious drugs for the pharmacological control of chronic pain states.
Keywords: PainBackground
The chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain was first developed by Bennett and Xie (1988). The chronic constriction is applied to the sciatic nerve mimicking a post-traumatic painful peripheral neuropathy. This model induces a partial denervation and, therefore, is very useful for a quantitative analysis of pain behaviours and for the evaluation of analgesic effect of novel drugs. The CCI of the sciatic nerve is carried out under isoflurane anesthesia (5% for induction and 2% for maintenance). The biceps femoris and the gluteus superficialis are separated by dissection to expose the sciatic nerve. The CCI is induced by loosely tying one ligature around the sciatic nerve, to preserve epineural circulation.
Analysis of pain behaviour is assessed by measuring mechanical allodynia 7, 14 and 21 days after surgery. Interestingly, one of the advantages of the CCI model is the objective score of pain behaviour in response to von Frey stimulation. Mechanical allodynia is quantitated by measuring the hind paw withdrawal response to von Frey filament stimulation. Mice are placed in a dark box with a wire grid bottom through which the von Frey filaments are applied by using the up-down paradigm previously described (Chaplan et al., 1994). Lack of response to a filament indicates the next filament with a higher bending force in the following stimulation, whereas a positive response indicated the next filament with a lower bending force. Each filament is applied and pressed perpendicularly to the plantar surface of the hind paw until it bends. The filament that evokes 3 paw withdrawals is assigned as the pain threshold in grams. Mice are treated with vehicle, novel potential analgesic drugs, or a classical analgesic drug, as positive analgesic control, and the mechanical thresholds are quantified. This protocol has been recently implemented by our research team (Font et al., 2017).
Overall, CCI model and measurements of mechanical allodynia could be considered as an experimental approach to assess the analgesic activity of any potential drug. Thus, we provide here a complete description of the CCI models and assessment of mechanical allodynia aiming at facilitating its implementation by other scientists.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
Data analysis
Representative example of data illustrating the type of results obtained is provided below.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by ERANET Neuron project ‘LIGHTPAIN’. This protocol was adapted from previous work: Font et al., 2017. The authors declare not conflict of interest.
References
Article Information
Copyright
Notartomaso et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
How to cite
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the original research article where this protocol was used:
Category
Neuroscience > Behavioral neuroscience > Animal model
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link