Published: Vol 7, Iss 3, Feb 5, 2017 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2117 Views: 10220
Reviewed by: Oneil G. BhalalaAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Optogenetic Interrogation of Electrophysiological Dendritic Properties and Their Effect on Pacemaking Neurons from Acute Rodent Brain Slices
Naomi Gilin [...] Joshua A. Goldberg
May 20, 2024 1266 Views
Quantification of Proliferating and Mitotically Active Retinal Cells in Mice by Flow Cytometry
Hope K. Vanzo-Sparks [...] Cindy L. Linn
Jul 5, 2024 1352 Views
Two-photon (2P) Microscopy to Study Ca2+ Signaling in Astrocytes From Acute Brain Slices
Annamaria Lia and Micaela Zonta
Jul 5, 2025 1519 Views
Abstract
All seven retinal cell types that make up the mature retina are generated from a common, multipotent pool of retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) (Wallace, 2011). One way that RPCs know when sufficient numbers of particular cell-types have been generated is through negative feedback signals, which are emitted by differentiated cells and must reach threshold levels to block additional differentiation of that cell type. A key assay to assess whether negative feedback signals are emitted by differentiated cells is a heterochronic pellet assay in which early stage RPCs are dissociated and labeled with BrdU, then mixed with a 20-fold excess of dissociated differentiated cells. The combined cells are then re-aggregated and cultured as a pellet on a membrane for 7-10 days in vitro. During this time frame, RPCs will differentiate, and the fate of the BrdU+ RPCs can be assessed using cell type-specific markers. Investigators who developed this pellet assay initially demonstrated that neonatal RPCs give rise to rods on an accelerated schedule compared to embryonic RPCs when the two cell types are mixed together (Watanabe and Raff, 1990; Watanabe et al., 1997). We have used this assay to demonstrate that sonic hedgehog (Shh), which we found acts as a negative regulator of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) differentiation, promotes RPC proliferation (Jensen and Wallace, 1997; Ringuette et al., 2014). More recently we modified the heterochronic pellet assay to assess the role of feedback signals for retinal amacrine cells, identifying transforming growth factor β2 (Tgfβ2) as a negative feedback signal, and Pten as a modulator of the Tgfβ2 response (Ma et al., 2007; Tachibana et al., 2016). This assay can be adapted to other lineages and tissues to assess cell-cell interactions between two different cell-types (heterotypic) in either an isochronic or heterochronic manner.
Keywords: Heterochronic pellet assayBackground
Several mechanisms are employed to ensure that the correct numbers of differentiated cells are generated during organ and tissue development. For example, progenitor cells may respond to the levels of hormones or growth factors secreted by differentiated cells, progenitors may count the number of divisions they undergo, or there may be a mechanism to count the final number of differentiated cells (Lui and Baron, 2011). In the retina, negative feedback signals that are secreted by differentiated cells are sensed by progenitor cells, which stop producing that differentiated cell type when the signals reach threshold levels (Belliveau and Cepko, 1999; Reh and Tully, 1986; Waid and McLoon, 1998). We and other have demonstrated that Shh is an essential negative regulator of a RGC fate (Wang et al., 2005; Zhang and Yang, 2001). We also dissected the feedback process for retinal amacrine cells, showing that the transcription factor Zac1 acts in amacrine cells to initiate transforming growth factor b2 (Tgfb2) expression, which negatively regulates RPC proliferation and amacrine cell differentiation (Ma et al., 2007). Notably, other TGFβ family members have similar feedback functions in the olfactory epithelium (Wu et al., 2003), pancreas (Harmon et al., 2004), and skeletal muscle (Tobin and Celeste, 2005). We also used the heterochronic pellet assay to examine how amacrine cell feedback signals are themselves regulated. We found that Pten is an essential positive regulator of amacrine cell differentiation, and using the pellet assay, we demonstrated that Pten acts in RPCs to control responsiveness to Tgfβ2 signaling (Tachibana et al., 2016). Understanding how amacrine cells and RPCs interact provides important new insights into how cell number is controlled in the retina. Notably, similar interactions between Pten and Tgfβ signaling may underlie cell number control in other vertebrate organs where Tgfβ signaling is an important determinant of organ size.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Notes:
Data analysis
Notes
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from Brain Canada to CS and VW and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) (Grant #89994) and Lion’s Sight Centre to CS. CS is the Dixon Family Chair in Ophthalmology Research at Sunnybrook Research Institute. NT was supported by an Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI)-CIHR scholarship. This protocol was adapted from procedures published in Tachibana et al. (2016) and Ma et al. (2007).
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the original research article where this protocol was used:
Category
Neuroscience > Cellular mechanisms > Intracellular signalling
Neuroscience > Sensory and motor systems > Retina
Cell Biology > Cell signaling > Intracellular Signaling
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link