Published: Vol 5, Iss 24, Dec 20, 2015 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1680 Views: 8506
Reviewed by: Maria SinetovaIgor Cesarino Anonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Delivery of the Cas9 or TevCas9 System into Phaeodactylum tricornutum via Conjugation of Plasmids from a Bacterial Donor
Helen Wang [...] David R. Edgell
Aug 20, 2018 8030 Views
Multiple Modification of Chromosomal Loci Using URA5.3 Selection Marker in the Unicellular Red Alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae
Tokiaki Takemura [...] Kan Tanaka
Apr 5, 2019 5209 Views
PEG-mediated, Stable, Nuclear and Chloroplast Transformation of Cyanidioschizon merolae
Maksymilian Zienkiewicz [...] Kinga Kania
Sep 5, 2019 4110 Views
Abstract
The unicellular microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (C. reinhardtii) has been used as a reference model for numerous fields of research. Principle research areas are eukaryotic flagellar structure and function, basal bodies (centrioles), cell-cell recognition, cell cycle control, chloroplast biogenesis, phototaxis, nonphotochemical quenching, and especially photosynthesis for C. reinhardtii can grow in the dark on an organic carbon (e.g. acetate), and thus provides advantages over land plants (Harris, 2001; Peers et al., 2009). C. reinhardtii has a short life cycle, a sequenced genome (Merchant et al., 2007), and a growing molecular toolbox for forward and reverse genetic studies, including transformation protocols, gene silencing (Kim and Cerutti, 2009; Molnar et al., 2009), and fluorescent protein-tag (Rasala et al., 2013). There are two commonly used methods for C. reinhardtii transformation – electroporation and glass bead agitation. Electroporation is normally restricted to strains with cell wall, as it kills cell-wall-deficient strains effectively if without careful handling of osmosis. Electroporation also requires special instruments such as electroporator and cuvettes. In contrast, glass bead agitation uses simple lab equipment. The mild shear created by agitation in the presence of glass bead allows cell-wall-deficient strains to take up DNA. If glass bead method is to be applied to cell-wall strains, cells need to be treated with autolysin (http://www.chlamy.org/methods/autolysin.html) to partially lyse the wall components. A pitfall of both methods is that the DNAs are often shortened by nuclease once entering the cells, making the downstream PCR-based genotyping of insertion site rather difficult. Here I describe an improved design of insertional mutagenesis used in (Tsai et al., 2014), and the transformation protocol using glass bead as previously described in (Kindle, 1990) with minor modification. The putative mutants can be selected by autotrophic or antibiotic resistance markers, and the disrupted loci can be mapped by methods such as plasmid rescue (Peers et al., 2009) and SiteFinding PCR (Tan et al., 2005).
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
Notes
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research [Grant FA9550-11-1-0264 (to C. B.)], by a Strategic Partnership grant from the MSU Foundation (to C. B.), and by MSU AgBioResearch (C. B.).
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2015 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Tsai, C. and Benning, C. (2015). Insertional Mutagenesis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Bio-protocol 5(24): e1680. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1680.
Category
Plant Science > Phycology > DNA
Molecular Biology > DNA > Mutagenesis
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link