Published: Vol 4, Iss 18, Sep 20, 2014 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1243 Views: 14467
Reviewed by: Hui ZhuXuecai GeAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Immunostaining Protocol: P-Smad2 (Xenograft and Mice)
Alexandre Calon [...] Eduard Batlle
May 5, 2014 8282 Views
Measuring the Endocytic Recycling of Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) in Neuro2a Cells
Florent Ubelmann [...] Claudia Guimas Almeida
Dec 5, 2017 7496 Views
Non-separate Mouse Sclerochoroid/RPE/Retina Staining and Whole Mount for the Integral Observation of Subretinal Layer
Sung-Jin Lee and Soo-Young Kim
Jan 5, 2021 3267 Views
Abstract
In situ hybridization and immunostaining are common techniques for localizing gene expression, the mRNA and protein respectively, within tissues. Both techniques can be applied to tissue sections to achieve similar goals, but in some cases, it is necessary to use them together. For example, complement C1q is a secreted protein complex that can target the innate immune response during inflammation. Complement has been found to be elevated early and before severe neurodegeneration in several disease models. Thus, complement may serve as an important marker for disease progression and may contribute to the pathology under certain conditions. Since complement is a secreted complex, immunostaining for C1q does not necessarily reveal where compliment is produced. In situ hybridization for complement components, C1q a, b, or c mRNA, is ideal to mark complement producing cells in tissue. In situ hybridization can be coupled with cell-type-specific immunostaining for accurate identification of the cell types involved. Protein localization and mRNA localization together can reveal details as to the relationship between complement producing and complement target cells within disease tissues. Here we outline the steps for combined in situ hybridization and immunostaining on the same tissue section. The protocol outlined here has been designed for detection of complement C1q in neurons and microglia in the mouse brain.
Provided here are two approaches for combined ISH/IH. In the 1st example, in situ hybridization of C1q mRNA is performed together with fluorescent detection of Purkinje neuron cell bodies using Calbindin-D28K antibody. In the 2nd example, C1q mRNA in situ is performed together with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) detection of microglia using CD68 antibody. Please note that modifications to the protocol may be needed for the use of distinct probes and antibodies, as well as alternate tissue-processing methods that are not specified herein. For appropriate examples of procedure results, please see images published in Lopez et al.. (2012).
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
The approach for dual immunostaining of protein and RNA in situ hybridization is sequential. The method to be performed first depends on whether the immune epitope can survive the in situ hybridization conditions. The polyclonal antibody against Calbindin-D28K, a Purkinje neuron-specific marker in the cerebellum, can be applied after C1q mRNA probe in situ hybridization. Thus, the immunostaining procedure for D28K can be performed after in situ hybridization. However, the monoclonal antibody against CD68, a microglial marker, cannot. Therefore, the immunostaining procedure for CD68 needs to be performed prior to in situ hybridization. Both processes are outlined.
Representative data
Figure 1. Example result from procedure B. Immunostaining 1st, in situ 2nd. Image shows Purkinje neuron layer (cerebellar Purkinje neurons are identified by morphology) of a neurodegenerative disease mouse with anti-CD68 DAB staining (brown) and C1q mRNA NBT/BCIP staining (purple). In this image the C1q staining was underdeveloped and appears weak in order to demonstrate the distinct brown DAB staining. Images were taken using a Zeiss Axioplan II microscope.
For additional representative data please see figures from the following Reference (Lopez et al., 2012).
Notes
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This protocol has been adapted from Lopez et al. (2012).
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2014 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Lopez, M. E. (2014). Combined in situ Hybridization/Immunohistochemistry (ISH/IH) on Free-floating Vibratome Tissue Sections. Bio-protocol 4(18): e1243. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1243.
Category
Neuroscience > Development > Immunofluorescence
Biochemistry > Protein > Immunodetection
Cell Biology > Cell imaging > Fluorescence
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link