Welcome guest, Sign in
Home
During mitosis chromosomes are condensed into dense X-shaped structures that allow for microscopic determination of karyotype as well as inspection of chromosome morphology. This protocol describes a method to perform immunostaining of formaldehyde-fixed metaphase chromosomes from the avian cell line DT40. It was developed to characterize the localization of YFP-tagged TopBP1 on mitotic chromosomes and specifically determine the percentage of TopBP1 foci that formed on breaks/gaps as well as ends of individual metaphase macrochromosomes (Pedersen et al., 2015). For this purpose immunostaining of YFP was applied. However, the protocol may be optimized for other cell lines or epitopes.
Thanks for your further question/comment. It has been sent to the author(s) of this protocol. You will receive a notification once your question/comment is addressed again by the author(s). Meanwhile, it would be great if you could help us to spread the word about Bio-protocol.
[Abstract] During mitosis chromosomes are condensed into dense X-shaped structures that allow for microscopic determination of karyotype as well as inspection of chromosome morphology. This protocol describes a method to perform immunostaining of formaldehyde-fixed metaphase chromosomes from the avian cell line DT40. It was developed to characterize the localization of YFP-tagged TopBP1 on mitotic chromosomes and specifically determine the percentage of TopBP1 foci that formed on breaks/gaps as well as ends of individual metaphase macrochromosomes (Pedersen et al., 2015). For this purpose immunostaining of YFP was applied. However, the protocol may be optimized for other cell lines or epitopes.
Keywords: Metaphase chromosomes, Cytogenetics, Genomic instability, Common fragile sites, Replication stress, Immunofluorescence, Microscopy
[Background] Microscopic analysis of stained metaphase chromosomes is a classical cytogenetic technique that is extensively used for both research and diagnostics. The basic principle involves induction of cell cycle arrest in metaphase by a spindle destabilizing reagent such as colcemid, which will trigger the spindle assembly checkpoint and therefore arrests cells in metaphase. This serves to enrich for cells with condensed chromosomes. Subsequently cells are subjected to swelling in hypotonic solution followed by spreading of mitotic cells on a microscope slide. The final result is microscopically detectable chromosomes from single cells convenient for karyotype analysis as well as investigations of individual chromosomes. Traditionally, swollen cells are fixed with methanol and acetic acid (3:1) before spreading on slides (Hungerford, 1965; Ronne et al., 1979). The method described here uses formaldehyde rather than methanol for fixation. This can be useful for subsequent staining with antibodies that are not compatible with methanol fixation. The protocol is optimized for metaphase spreads from chicken DT40 cells, and immunostaining of YFP-tagged TopBP1 on metaphase macrochromosomes (Pedersen et al., 2015). TopBP1 foci on mitotic chromosomes mark DNA insults that are transmitted to G1 daughter cells (Pedersen et al., 2015; Gallina et al., 2016; Oestergaard and Lisby, 2016). The fluorescent signal of YFP is lost during the preparation of metaphase spreads, therefore this protocol includes immunostaining of the YFP epitope. However, it should be possible to apply the protocol for other cell lines and epitopes by optimizing incubation time in hypotonic buffer and antibody concentrations, respectively. Aphidicolin is a replication inhibitor, which at low concentration induces formation of gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes preferentially at common fragile sites (Durkin and Glover, 2007). As stated by this protocol, DT40 cells may be subjected to 0.5 μM aphidicolin to induce breaks and gaps on metaphase chromosomes in DT40 (Pedersen et al., 2015). The avian karyotype comprises macrochromosomes as well as mini and microchromosomes. The latter two groups are too small to reliably determine features such as breaks/gaps or ends. They are therefore not included in this analysis.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Data analysis
Images can be processed and analyzed with Volocity software (PerkinElmer) or ImageJ. Macrochromosomes suitable for analysis are selected based on the following criteria; they should be in focus, they should not overlie other chromosomes and they should be longer than 2 μm. Selected macrochromosomes is then analyzed for gaps or breaks and TopBP1 foci localization (Figure 3). Gaps and breaks are defined as areas on chromosomes with no DAPI staining. Many macrochromosomes do not hold TopBP1 foci. When TopBP1 foci are present they can be classified into three categories: I: at chromosome ends, II: at gaps/breaks or III: at internal sites (which corresponds to the remaining foci found on the chromosomes). Figure 3. Representative images of slides prepared according to the protocol. Images showing interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosome spreads. Macrochromosomes suitable for analysis are encircled by read dashed line. Left panel: metaphase spreads from untr. cells. Top, DAPI staining. Middle, Alexa-488 staining of YFP-tagged TopBP1. Bottom, merge. Right panel: metaphase spreads from aphidicolin-treated cells. Left, DAPI staining. Middle, Alexa-488 staining of YFP-tagged TopBP1. Bottom, merge. Chromosomes with TopBP1 at the end are marked by red asterisks. Chromosome with TopBP1 at a break is marked by a yellow asterisk. Scale bars = 8 μm. The data can be quantified by analyzing 250-300 macrochromosomes from both untreated and aphidicolin-treated cells from three independent experiments (80-100 from each condition of each experiment). Data can be presented in a column diagram showing for each condition: a. the percentage of macrochromosomes with TopBP1 at the end, b. the percentage of macrochromosomes with TopBP1 at gaps and breaks, and c. the percentage of macrochromosomes with TopBP1 at an internal site. It is recommended that data be analyzed blinded.
Notes
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Villum Foundation. This protocol is adapted from (Jeppesen, 2000).
References
Bio-protocol's major goal is to make reproducing an experiment an easier task. If you have used this protocol, it would be great if you could share your experience by leaving some comments, uploading images or even sharing some videos. Please login to post your feedback.
Login | Register
View Original Delete
Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol. You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.