Welcome guest, Sign in
Home
Gram-negative bacteria naturally release outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) to the surrounding environment. OMVs contribute to multiple processes, such as cell-cell communication, delivery of enzymes and toxins, resistance to environmental stresses and pathogenesis. Little is known about OMVs produced by plant-pathogenic bacteria, and their interactions with host plants. The protocol described below discusses the isolation process of OMVs from Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris strain 33913, a bacterial pathogen of Crucifiers. Nevertheless, this protocol can be used and/or adapted for isolation of OMVs from other phytopathogenic bacteria to promote the study of OMVs in the context of plant-microbe interactions.
Thanks for your further question/comment. It has been sent to the author(s) of this protocol. You will receive a notification once your question/comment is addressed again by the author(s). Meanwhile, it would be great if you could help us to spread the word about Bio-protocol.
[Abstract] Gram-negative bacteria naturally release outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) to the surrounding environment. OMVs contribute to multiple processes, such as cell-cell communication, delivery of enzymes and toxins, resistance to environmental stresses and pathogenesis. Little is known about OMVs produced by plant-pathogenic bacteria, and their interactions with host plants. The protocol described below discusses the isolation process of OMVs from Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris strain 33913, a bacterial pathogen of Crucifiers. Nevertheless, this protocol can be used and/or adapted for isolation of OMVs from other phytopathogenic bacteria to promote the study of OMVs in the context of plant-microbe interactions.
Keywords: OMVs, Outer membrane vesicles, Extracellular vesicles, Isolation, Purification, Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, Plant-microbe interactions
[Background] Extracellular vesicle (EV) release is a process shared by many organisms from all domains of life. In Gram-negative bacteria, most EVs are a result of the outer membrane blebbing and eventually pinching off the bacterial cell wall, and are hence referred to as outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). The study of OMVs focuses on OMV biogenesis, cargo, functions and interactions with host organisms. To date, most of the study on OMVs focused on bacterial pathogens of humans and environmental bacteria, however very little research has been done on OMVs from phytopathogenic bacteria. The protocol described here was adapted from the protocol described by Chutkan et al. (2013) with slight modification, and presented here with the phytopathogen X. campestris pv. campestris. To our understanding this is the first, fully detailed, protocol for isolation of OMVs from phytopatogenic bacteria and we hope it could serve as a guiding protocol for other research groups interested in this topic.
Materials and Reagents
Note: (optional) – not necessary for the vesicles’ isolation process.
Equipment
Notes
Procedure
Data analysis
Perhaps one of the main challenges in purifying OMVs from bacterial culture is to prove its purity. Since OMVs are purified from culture supernatants the risk of contamination by surface, extracellular bacterial appendages, such as flagella, pili, fimbriae, must be taken into consideration. Carefully examining multiple TEM grid samples and determining whether such appendages had co-purified with the OMVs or not is highly recommended to assure purity. Another possible contaminant of OMV preparations are broken cell debris and large protein complexes. To minimize the chances of broken cell contamination cultures should be harvested during the logarithmic growth phase when cell death and breakage is less likely to occur. Additionally, we highly recommend that the density gradient centrifugation step will be carried out for any down-stream studies, especially for analytical studies such as proteomics, to avoid co-purification of large protein or protein complexes from the supernatant.
Recipes
Acknowledgments
Work at O. Bahar lab was supported by the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF), grant No. I-2392-203.13/2015 and by the Israel Science Foundation, grant No. 2025/16. We would like also to thank our lab members for every help given, S. Burdman’s lab, M. Levy’s lab, and N. Sela, for collaboration in experiments, and also M. Mawassi’s lab, V. Gaba’s lab, A. Dombrovsky’s lab, and S. Manulis-Sasson’s lab, for some of the equipment needed for the experiments.
References
Bio-protocol's major goal is to make reproducing an experiment an easier task. If you have used this protocol, it would be great if you could share your experience by leaving some comments, uploading images or even sharing some videos. Please login to post your feedback.
Login | Register
View Original Delete
Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol. You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.
Tiffany Lowe-PowerUW-Madison
Why did you choose to use 0.22 um filters? OMVs can range in size from 30-300 nm, so these filters might exclude the larger vesicles.
View Original
Ofir Bahar (Author)Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research,Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center
Your point is absolutely true.We had to decide whether we want to be more stringent with the filtering by using the 0.22uM, on the cost of loosing some large OMV, or use 0.45uM and then risk that some contaminants will go through the filter. Since we had some contamination issues in the past while using the 0.45uM we decided be on the safe side with the filtering.
Reply Close