Welcome guest, Sign in
Home
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men in the United States. Comprehensive understanding of the biology contributing to prostate cancer will have important clinical implications. Animal models have greatly impacted our knowledge of disease and will continue to be a valuable resource for future studies. Herein, we describe a detailed protocol for the orthotopic engraftment of a murine prostate cancer cell line (Myc-CaP) into the anterior prostate of an immune competent mouse.
Thanks for your further question/comment. It has been sent to the author(s) of this protocol. You will receive a notification once your question/comment is addressed again by the author(s). Meanwhile, it would be great if you could help us to spread the word about Bio-protocol.
[Abstract] Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men in the United States. Comprehensive understanding of the biology contributing to prostate cancer will have important clinical implications. Animal models have greatly impacted our knowledge of disease and will continue to be a valuable resource for future studies. Herein, we describe a detailed protocol for the orthotopic engraftment of a murine prostate cancer cell line (Myc-CaP) into the anterior prostate of an immune competent mouse.
Keywords: Orthotopic allograft, Myc-CaP, Prostate, Cancer, Metastasis, in vivo, Mouse model
[Background] Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in men due to a subset of cancers that metastasize. The genetic and molecular factors that drive local tumor development and progression to metastatic disease, however, remain incompletely understood. Both genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models and xenograft models of prostate cancer have contributed to our understanding of the genetics of prostate cancer (Ittmann et al., 2013; Park et al., 2010). Genetic manipulation, either by prostate specific transgenic overexpression such as in Hi-Myc mice (Ellwood-Yen et al., 2003) or by prostate specific deletion such as in Pten-/- mice (Wang et al., 2003), is advantageous because it models tumor development and progression in the organ microenvironment in an immune competent mouse. Development of metastatic prostate cancer is variable among these GEM models, with a low frequency in some such as the Pten-/- model (Wang et al., 2003), and a higher frequency in other models such as TRAMP (transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate) (Greenberg et al., 1995) and Hi-Myc/Pten-/- (Hubbard et al., 2016). Despite their great utility for prostate cancer research, it is difficult, time-consuming, and costly to further genetically manipulate GEM models. To overcome some of these limitations, researchers have relied on both subcutaneous and orthotopic xenografts of human cell lines. Cell lines can be genetically manipulated in vitro in a variety of ways. While subcutaneous xenografts are advantageous due to their ease of injection and monitoring, orthotopic xenografts better recapitulate the local tumor microenvironment which may affect sensitivity to drugs (Wilmanns et al., 1992; Kuo et al., 1993), methylation patterns (Fleming et al., 2010), growth rate (Fleming et al., 2010), and ultimately predictions for clinical response (Killion et al., 1998; Hoffman, 1999). In addition, some human prostate cancer cell line models metastasize from xenografts implanted orthotopically. A limitation of all xenograft models is that they require immunocompromised mice making it difficult to model tumor progression in an intact immune system. The Myc-CaP cell line (Watson et al., 2005) allows for engraftment either subcutaneously or orthotopically in immune competent syngeneic (FVB/N) mice (Watson et al., 2005; Hurley et al., 2015). Myc-CaP was derived from a prostate carcinoma from a Hi-Myc mouse (Watson et al., 2005). When engrafted orthotopically, Myc-CaP cells metastasize to abdominal lymph nodes, liver, and lung (Hurley et al., 2015). Additionally, Myc-CaP are amenable to in vitro manipulation of gene expression (Hurley et al., 2015). Thus, Myc-CaP can be used as an easily manipulable model for both tumor growth in the prostate and metastatic growth in mice with an intact immune system. Herein, we describe the methods for orthotopic engraftment of Myc-CaP cells into the mouse anterior prostate.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
Note: All procedures conducted in mice must first have institutional ACUC approval.
Data analysis
We recommend considering the ARRIVE Guidelines (Kilkenny et al., 2010) for in vivo animal study design, analyses, and reporting. As outlined in the ARRIVE Guidelines, take comprehensive records of study design, experimental procedures, experimental animals, animal housing and husbandry, sample size, allocation of animals to experimental groups, experimental outcomes, and statistical methods (Kilkenny et al., 2010). To determine sample size (number of animals per experimental and control groups), first calculate the required effect size for both continuous and categorical measurements. For example, if during a pilot study we determine that the control group’s primary tumor weighs on average (0.122 g ± 0.072 g) and the experimental group’s primary tumor weighs (0.038 g ± 0.0133 g), then the effect size, d = 1.622467. Using a two-sided test with α error of probability = 0.05, power = 0.8, and an allocation ratio of control/experimental = 1, the sample size for both groups should be 8 animals to demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the groups (Festing and Altman, 2002). To account for a 20% error rate, we would use 10 animals per group. Note: A pilot study should be performed first in order to determine the appropriate sample size for a given experiment. We strongly recommend consulting with a biostatistician during the project design phase of any animal study. The appropriate statistical methods for data analysis will depend on the experimental design and experimental outcomes assessed. To improve experimental robustness, we recommend two independent experimental replications and blinded data analysis. If any animals are excluded from the final analyses, provide sound rationale for exclusion such as cell leakage into the body cavity as evidenced by multiple metastatic lesions on the body cavity wall.
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This protocol was adapted from a previously published study (Hurley et al., 2015). This work was supported by The Prostate Cancer Foundation Hagen Challenge Award; The Patrick C. Walsh Prostate Cancer Fund, and The Hinman Urologic Endowed Fund Educational Scholarship.
References
Bio-protocol's major goal is to make reproducing an experiment an easier task. If you have used this protocol, it would be great if you could share your experience by leaving some comments, uploading images or even sharing some videos. Please login to post your feedback.
Login | Register
View Original Delete
Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol. You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.