Welcome guest, Sign in

Home

X
加载中

Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF) is a rapid, economical, and a straightforward technique for estimating the thermal stability of proteins. The principle involves the binding of a fluorescent dye to thermally exposed hydrophobic pockets of a protein. The dyes used in this technique are highly fluorescent in a non-polar environment and are quenched when exposed to aqueous solution. The change in fluorescence can be used to follow unfolding of proteins induced by temperature, pH, or chaotropic agents. The method is well characterized for monomeric proteins. Here, we extend the application to supramolecular protein and nucleo-protein complexes using virus particles as an example. SYPRO-orange™ dye is the dye of choice because it is matched for use with q-PCR instruments and the fluorescence response is stable across a wide range of pH and temperatures. Advantages of this technique over standard biophysical methods include the ability for high-throughput screening of biological and technical replicates and the high sensitivity.

Thanks for your further question/comment. It has been sent to the author(s) of this protocol. You will receive a notification once your question/comment is addressed again by the author(s).
Meanwhile, it would be great if you could help us to spread the word about Bio-protocol.

X

Fluorometric Estimation of Viral Thermal Stability

Microbiology > Microbial biochemistry > Protein > Modification
Authors: Vamseedhar Rayaprolu
Vamseedhar RayaproluAffiliation: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, USA
Bio-protocol author page: a1553
Shannon Kruse
Shannon KruseAffiliation: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, USA
Bio-protocol author page: a1554
Ravi Kant
Ravi KantAffiliation: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, USA
Bio-protocol author page: a1555
Navid Movahed
Navid MovahedAffiliation: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, USA
Bio-protocol author page: a1556
Dewey Brooke
Dewey BrookeAffiliation: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, USA
Bio-protocol author page: a1557
 and Brian Bothner
Brian BothnerAffiliation: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, USA
For correspondence: bbothner@chemistry.montana.edu
Bio-protocol author page: a1558
Vol 4, Iss 15, 8/5/2014, 1990 views, 1 Q&A, How to cite
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.1199

[Abstract] Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF) is a rapid, economical, and a straightforward technique for estimating the thermal stability of proteins. The principle involves the binding of a fluorescent dye to thermally exposed hydrophobic pockets of a protein. The dyes used in this technique are highly fluorescent in a non-polar environment and are quenched when exposed to aqueous solution. The change in fluorescence can be used to follow unfolding of proteins induced by temperature, pH, or chaotropic agents. The method is well characterized for monomeric proteins. Here, we extend the application to supramolecular protein and nucleo-protein complexes using virus particles as an example. SYPRO-orange™ dye is the dye of choice because it is matched for use with q-PCR instruments and the fluorescence response is stable across a wide range of pH and temperatures. Advantages of this technique over standard biophysical methods include the ability for high-throughput screening of biological and technical replicates and the high sensitivity.

Keywords: Biophysics, Virology, Fluorescence, Hydrophobic patches, Subunit interactions

Materials and Reagents

  1. Purified Virus Like Particles (VLPs) of Adeno-associated virus serotypes 1, 2, 5, 8
  2. Purified recombinant AAV (rAAV) capsids packaging a green fluorescent protein gene (GFP), rAAV1-GFP, rAAV5-GFP, rAAV8-GFP
  3. PBS (pH 7.0) at 25 °C
  4. Citric acid (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: BP339-500)
  5. Disodium phosphate (VWR International, catalog number: BDH4538-1KGP)
  6. 5,000x SYPRO Orange (Life Technologies, catalog number: S6651)
  7. Sodium hydroxide (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: BP359-500)
  8. 12 N hydrochloric acid (EMD Millipore, catalog number: HX0603-3)
  9. Sodium chloride (VWR International, catalog number: BDH4534-5KGP)
  10. Magnesium chloride (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number : BP214-500)
  11. Molecular biology grade water
  12. Citrate-Phosphate buffer (see Recipes)

Equipment

  1. Rotor Gene-3000, qPCR instrument with 36-well rotor (QIAGEN)
  2. 0.2 ml PCR tubes (BioExpress, catalog number: T-3013-1FC)
  3. Aluminum foil
  4. Pipette tips (10 µl, 200 µl) (VWR International, catalog numbers: 37001-162 and 53508-810)
  5. Pipetts (200 µl, 0.1-2.5 µl) (Eppendorf, BioExpress, catalog numbers: P-3015-6 and P-3015-1)
  6. pH meter (Accument Basic AB 15 pH meter) (Thermo Fisher Scientific)
  7. Milli-Q purification system (EMD Millipore)

Software

  1. Rotor gene software (Version 1.7, Build 94)
  2. Microsoft Excel 2007 on Windows 7

Procedure

  1. Each of the VLP and recombinant virus samples were diluted into PBS or the citrate-phosphate buffer to obtain concentrations between 0.1-0.24 mg/ml. A sample of lysozyme, at a concentration of 0.24 mg/ml, was included in each run as a positive control. The concentrations of the samples were varied to obtain similar fluorescence intensities on the instrument.
  2. Aliquots of the concentrated 5,000x SYPRO Orange was stored at -20 °C and gently and completely thawed out to room temperature before every reaction setup.
  3. 1 µl of the SYPRO Orange was diluted into 100 µl of distilled water to obtain a 1% 50x working stock. As SYPRO Orange is light sensitive, the working stock was covered with aluminum foil and kept in the dark till right before distribution.
  4. 2.5 µl of the working stock was added to each of the above samples. The remaining working stock, if any, was discarded if not used after 4 h.
  5. The samples were kept in an aluminum foil covered box to prevent exposure to light till they were transferred into the qPCR machine.
  6. The assays were conducted with a temperature ramping from 30 to 99 °C, increasing 1 degree every 1 min.
  7. The data was exported into a text (.csv) file and transferred into Microsoft Excel 2007 for data analysis.

Representative data

  1. The raw intensity data from all the samples was normalized to an upper limit of 100% by dividing all values by the largest recorded intensity in that sample. The data was plotted with temperature on the X-axis and the normalized intensity on the Y-axis.
  2. The raw data was also used to calculate the change in fluorescence per change in temperature (dF/dT). The maximum value obtained from this calculation was defined as the melting temperature (Tm). This can be accomplished by taking the difference between sequential fluorescent readings divided by the change in temperature between measurements. The change in intensity (dF) can then be graphed vs temperature. The largest value will can then be visualized or selected from the list. As described here, the temperature step-size is 1 degree.


    Figure 1. Showing a representative image of two Adeno-associated virus samples and a Lysozyme positive control. The x-axis shows temperature and y-axis shows the fluorescence intensity normalized to a 100%.

Notes

  1. SYPRO Orange can be excited with UV light at 300 nm or using visible light at 472 nm. The emission is measured 570 nm.
  2. The qPCR machine had a limited set of filters for SYPRO Orange. Though the excitation was possible at 470 nm, the spectra were collected at an emission wavelength of 550 nm. Although this was 20 nm lesser than the optimal emission wavelength, the peak intensity observed was ~50% of that observed at 570 nm. More importantly, the signal to noise ratio was very high thereby implying high quality data.
  3. The complementary data obtained from Differential Scanning Calorimetry (data not shown) also correlated accurately with that obtained from our method thereby further enhancing the value of our data (Rayaprolu et al., 2013).
  4. There are 36 vacant positions available on the rotor of the machine. A PCR tube that contains only buffer solution and the dye is used as a negative control. For this sample to be recognized as the negative control, this PCR tube needs to be placed in the first position in the rotor. The second position is occupied by a tube containing only buffer with no protein or dye added. This lets us determine if the buffer solution is contributing to the fluorescence intensity. The third position contains a lysozyme reaction aliquot (as described in the Procedure section). This acts as a positive control. Lysozyme’s melting temperature has been well documented in the literature. We compare the results we got from the DSF with the previously documented ones. More than one concentration of lysozyme was initially tested to confirm the melting temperature and the fluorescence linearity.

Recipes

  1. Citrate-Phosphate buffer
    43.6% 0.2 M disodium phosphate
    6.4% of 0.1 M citric acid
    50 mM sodium chloride
    Check to see if the pH is 7.0, if not, adjust with hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide to attain pH 7.0.
    Make up to the required volume with water

Acknowledgments

The work was funded by the grant R01 AI081961-01A1 from National Institutes of Health (NIH). This protocol was adapted from Rayaprolu et al. (2012).

References

  1. Rayaprolu, V., Kruse, S., Kant, R., Venkatakrishnan, B., Movahed, N., Brooke, D., Lins, B., Bennett, A., Potter, T., McKenna, R., Agbandje-McKenna, M. and Bothner, B. (2013). Comparative analysis of adeno-associated virus capsid stability and dynamics. J Virol 87(24): 13150-13160.
  2. Vedadi, M., Niesen, F. H., Allali-Hassani, A., Fedorov, O. Y., Finerty, P. J., Jr., Wasney, G. A., Yeung, R., Arrowsmith, C., Ball, L. J., Berglund, H., Hui, R., Marsden, B. D., Nordlund, P., Sundstrom, M., Weigelt, J. and Edwards, A. M. (2006). Chemical screening methods to identify ligands that promote protein stability, protein crystallization, and structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(43): 15835-15840.
  3. Yeh, A. P., McMillan, A. and Stowell, M. H. (2006). Rapid and simple protein-stability screens: application to membrane proteins. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 62(Pt 4): 451-457.
  4. http://www.lifetechnologies.com/us/en/home/life-science/cell-analysis/labeling-chemistry/fluorescence- spectraviewer.html#product=S6650.


How to cite this protocol: Rayaprolu, V., Kruse, S., Kant, R., Movahed, N., Brooke, D. and Bothner, B. (2014). Fluorometric Estimation of Viral Thermal Stability. Bio-protocol 4(15): e1199. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1199; Full Text



Share Your Feedback:

  • Add Photo
  • Add Video

Bio-protocol's major goal is to make reproducing an experiment an easier task. If you have used this protocol, it would be great if you could share your experience by leaving some comments, uploading images or even sharing some videos. Please login to post your feedback.

Q&A and Troubleshooting:

  • Add Photo
  • Add Video

Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol.
You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.


Login | Register
3/2/2016 6:16:03 AM  

Kathrin Schlicht
Universität Bielefeld

Dear Sir or Madam

We have troubles to reach a virus concentration of 0,1 to 0,24 mg/mL. So our question is how you determined the protein concentration.

Yours sincerely

Kathrin Schlicht

3/2/2016 8:25:51 AM  

Vamseedhar Rayaprolu (Author)
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,Montana State University

Hi Kathrin,

We determined concentrations using gel densitometry. You could also use UV 280 to determine the protein concentration but because our virus sample also had DNA, we preferred running the gel and doing the densitometry. You can increase your protein concentration using molecular a weight cut off filter though AAV samples tend to stick to the filters quite a bit. The samples were obtained from our collaborators. For more information on purification of the virus and checking integrity, please refer to http://jvi.asm.org/content/87/24/13150.full

I hope this helps.

The latest modification time: 3/2/2016 8:43:40 AM

3/2/2016 11:42:39 PM  

Kathrin Schlicht
Universität Bielefeld

Hi Vamseedhar,

we produce our AAVs by calcium phosphate-based transfection of plasmid DNA into HEK cells. The viral titer we reach is bellow the titer you need to get a protein concentration that high even after concentration by a molecular cut off filter. So we can`t perform DSF. We really like to test this method. Maybe you know how many HEK cells were transfected.

Thank you for your quick response.

3/5/2016 11:16:06 AM  

Vamseedhar Rayaprolu (Author)
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,Montana State University

Hi,

Sorry for the delayed response. Please look at the original reference (I posted the link in the previous post). Also look at references 51-54 in that link. This method was developed by our collaborators in SF9 using a baculoviral expression system. Let me know if you need more information.

Reply

Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol.
You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.

Login | Register

Share
Twitter Twitter
LinkedIn LinkedIn
Google+ Google+
Facebook Facebook