Welcome guest, Sign in

Home

X
加载中

Since its discovery in 1969, enterovirus 71 (EV71) has emerged as a serious worldwide health threat. This member of the picornavirus family causes hand, foot, and mouth disease, and also has the capacity to invade the central nervous system to cause severe disease and death. This is the propagation and purification procedure to produce infectious virion.

Thanks for your further question/comment. It has been sent to the author(s) of this protocol. You will receive a notification once your question/comment is addressed again by the author(s).
Meanwhile, it would be great if you could help us to spread the word about Bio-protocol.

X

Enterovirus 71 Virus Propagation and Purification

Microbiology > Microbial cell biology > Cell isolation and culture
Authors: Kristin L. Shingler
Kristin L. ShinglerAffiliation: Microbiology and Immunology Department, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
Bio-protocol author page: a1324
Lindsey J. Organtini
Lindsey J. OrgantiniAffiliation: Microbiology and Immunology Department, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
Bio-protocol author page: a1325
 and Susan Hafenstein
Susan HafensteinAffiliation: Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
For correspondence: shafenstein@hmc.psu.edu
Bio-protocol author page: a1326
Vol 4, Iss 9, 5/5/2014, 3339 views, 0 Q&A, How to cite
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.1117

[Abstract] Since its discovery in 1969, enterovirus 71 (EV71) has emerged as a serious worldwide health threat. This member of the picornavirus family causes hand, foot, and mouth disease, and also has the capacity to invade the central nervous system to cause severe disease and death. This is the propagation and purification procedure to produce infectious virion.

Keywords: Virus purification, Gradient, Picornavirus, Procapsid

Materials and Reagents

  1. Hela cells
  2. EV71 inoculum (ATCC, www.atcc.org)
  3. DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: SH3002201)
  4. Fetal Bovine Serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: SH3039603)
  5. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: P156-3)
  6. Tris-HCl
  7. Magnesium chloride (MgCl2)
  8. 0.5 M NaCl
  9. 0.05 mg/ml DNase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: NC9709009)
  10. 0.1 M EDTA (pH=8.0)
  11. Ammonium hydroxide (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: A5132-5 Kg)
  12. Potassium tartrate (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 25516-500 g)
  13. 100 kD cutoff spin column with 4 ml capacity (Millipore, catalog number: UFC810096)
  14. 30% sucrose-cushion in purification buffer
  15. Purification buffer (see Recipes)

Equipment

  1. Cell Stacks (1 10-stack and 1 2-stack) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog numbers: 12-567-303 and 12-567-301)
  2. Centrifuge
  3. SLA1500 rotor
  4. 50.2ti rotor
  5. 26.3 ml red-capped Beckman tubes (Beckman Coulter, catalog number: 355618)
  6. SW41 rotor
  7. Beckman Ultra-Clear centrifuge tubes (14 x 89 mm) (Beckman Coulter, catalog number: 344059)
  8. Chemistry ring stand with clamp
  9. Small light source
  10. Microcentrifuge

Procedure

  1. 90-95% confluent Hela cell monolayers (passage number not exceeding 30) grown in cell stacks (1 10-stack and 1 2-stack) were infected with EV71 strain 1095/Shiga at an MOI of 0.1 in culture with 600 ml of DMEM (500 ml in 10-stack and 100 ml in 2-stack). Virus was allowed to attach and infect for one hour at 37 °C. 600 ml of DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (500 ml in 10-stack and 100 ml in 2-stack) was added to achieve a final volume of 1,200 ml total (1,000 ml in 10-stack and 200 ml in 2-stack). Infections were allowed to continue at 37 °C.
  2. Cells and media were harvested 24 h post infection, (or as soon as cytopathic effects were obvious) and subjected to three freeze-thaw cycles. To remove cell debris, the lysate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm in a SLA1500 rotor at 4 °C for 15 min. To the lysate, PEG 8000 was added to provide a final concentration of 8% and NaCl, was added to provide a final concentration of 0.5 M. Virus was precipitated overnight at 4 °C with stirring and then centrifuged in a SLA1500 rotor (4 °C, 13,000 rpm, 45 min).
  3. Pellets were resuspended in 10 ml purification buffer, bottles were rinsed with 5 ml purification buffer, and 0.05 mg/ml DNase was added (do not exceed total buffer volume of 20 ml). The suspension was incubated at room temperature for 10 min with gentle rocking.
  4. After incubation, 0.1 M EDTA (pH=8.0) was added (10% total volume), the pH was adjusted using ammonium hydroxide, and supernatant was cleared by low speed centrifugation (4,000 rpm, 5 min, 4 °C).
  5. The supernatant was transferred to a red-capped Beckman tube. 2 ml of 30% sucrose in purification buffer was pipetted directly underneath the virus-containing supernatant. The virus was then pelleted through the sucrose cushion (50.2ti rotor, 48,000 rpm, 4 °C, 2 h).
  6. The pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of purification buffer, tube rinsed with an additional 1 ml of purification buffer, centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 5 min to remove any remaining cellular debris, and supernatant applied to a 10-35% potassium tartrate (K-Tartrate) step gradient in the Ultra-clear centrifuge tubes for final purification by ultracentrifugation (36,000 rpm, 4 °C, 2 h, SW41 rotor).
  7. The centrifuge tube was immobilized in a clamp on a ring stand above a small light source (Figure 1). Other light sources were extinguished to visualize the two distinct bands of virus, which were collected by side puncture and diluted in purification buffer to reach a final volume of 4 ml. The 4 ml sample was placed into a 100 kD cutoff spin column and the volume was reduced to about 50-100 microliters by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm. The sample was diluted again with purification buffer to return the volume to 4 ml and then centrifuged to reduce volume to 50-100 microliters. This process of washing the sample to remove tartrate and replace it with purification buffer was repeated in three more wash steps (four in total).


    Figure 1. A) Two bands of virus in the tartrate gradient are visible when a small light source is placed beneath the centrifuge tube. B) The upper band contains empty capsids, which have intact VP0 whereas the lower band C) contains native infectious virus. As assayed by negative stain TEM (shown) and PAGE gel (data not shown).

  8. The concentration of the final 100 microliters of virus was determined by spectrometry reading (procapsid read at wavelength of 280 nm and native virus read at a wavelength of 260 nm).
  9. As previously reported the upper band consisted of procapsid, characterized by the presence of uncleaved VP0 and lack of genomic material. The lower band consisted of native virus comprised of VP2 and VP4, with packaged genome. Each species was diluted to a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml for storage. Procapsid is stored at 4 °C and native virus is stored at -80 °C.

Recipes

  1. Purification buffer
    10 mM Tris-HCl
    200 mM NaCl
    50 mM MgCl2
    pH=7.5 (if initial pH is < 7.5, adjust with 1 M NaOH, if initial pH is > 7.5, adjust with 1 M HCl)

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by the Pennsylvania Department of Health Tobacco CURE Funds and the Junior Faculty Research Scholar Max Lang Award from the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. This protocol was previously described in Shingler et al. (2013).

References

  1. Cifuente, J. O., Lee, H., Yoder, J. D., Shingler, K. L., Carnegie, M. S., Yoder, J. L., Ashley, R. E., Makhov, A. M., Conway, J. F. and Hafenstein, S. (2013). Structures of the procapsid and mature virion of enterovirus 71 strain 1095. J Virol 87(13): 7637-7645.
  2. Shingler, K. L., Yoder, J. L., Carnegie, M. S., Ashley, R. E., Makhov, A. M., Conway, J. F. and Hafenstein, S. (2013). The enterovirus 71 A-particle forms a gateway to allow genome release: a cryoEM study of picornavirus uncoating. PLoS Pathog 9(3): e1003240.


How to cite: Shingler, K. L., Organtini, L. J. and Hafenstein, S. (2014). Enterovirus 71 Virus Propagation and Purification. Bio-protocol 4(9): e1117. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1117; Full Text



Share Your Feedback:

  • Add Photo
  • Add Video

Bio-protocol's major goal is to make reproducing an experiment an easier task. If you have used this protocol, it would be great if you could share your experience by leaving some comments, uploading images or even sharing some videos. Please login to post your feedback.

Q&A and Troubleshooting:

  • Add Photo
  • Add Video

Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol.
You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.


Login | Register
How to cite
Share
Twitter Twitter
LinkedIn LinkedIn
Google+ Google+
Facebook Facebook