发布: 2017年05月20日第7卷第10期 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2282 浏览次数: 6690
评审: Soyun KimCarey Y. L. HuhAnonymous reviewer(s)
Abstract
This protocol describes a novel dual task comparison across two variants of a tactile-visual conditional discrimination (CD) T-maze task, one is dependent upon spatial working memory (SWM; CDWM) and the other one (CDSTANDARD) is not. The task variants are equivalent in their sensory and motor requirements and overt behavior of the rat. Therefore, differences between the two task variants in the dependent variables such as choice accuracy, neural firing patterns, and the effects of pharmacological or optogenetic inactivation in brain regions of interest can be attributed to SWM, ruling out confounding sensorimotor variables, such as tactile, visual and self-motion cues. The CDWM task protocol is published in Hallock et al., 2013b and Urban et al., 2014.
Keywords: Spatial working memory (空间工作记忆)Background
Our laboratory is interested in exploring the neural mechanisms of working memory. Therefore, we have developed a task that can be used to assess spatial working memory (SWM) ability in rats. Working memory is defined as holding a limited amount of information ‘online’ so that the information can be used or manipulated to guide goal-directed behavior (Baddley, 1992). Because rodents are naturally inclined to forage for food, they are excellent models to use to probe SWM. Our laboratory has developed and used a conditional discrimination (CD) T-maze task in which floor inserts that vary in texture and color serve as conditional cues for the rewarded goal arm (Griffin et al., 2012; Hallock and Griffin, 2013; Hallock et al., 2013a; Shaw et al., 2013; Hallock et al., 2016). For example, the rats learn to choose the left goal arm if they encounter a mesh insert and the right goal arm if they encounter a wooden insert. To discriminate between the inserts, rats can use visual information (black vs. light brown), tactile information (rough mesh vs. smooth wood), or a combination of both types of information. Because the insert covers the entire floor of the maze and is available when the rat makes a goal-arm choice, this task does not require SWM. More recently, we have developed a working-memory variant of the task (CDWM; Hallock et al., 2013b; Urban et al., 2014). In this variant of the task, the floor insert cues extend only halfway up the central arm of the maze and are not available when the rat makes a goal-arm choice, thus requiring the rats to hold the cue in mind for a brief period of time in order to make a correct choice and receive food reward. In an ongoing experiment, we have found that it is possible to train rats on both variants of the task, giving us a powerful way to identify behavioral correlates of SWM while ruling out confounding sensorimotor variables such as visual, tactile, and self-motion cues.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment



Procedure
文章信息
版权信息
© 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
如何引用
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the original research article where this protocol was used:
分类
神经科学 > 行为神经科学 > 认知
您对这篇实验方法有问题吗?
在此处发布您的问题,我们将邀请本文作者来回答。同时,我们会将您的问题发布到Bio-protocol Exchange,以便寻求社区成员的帮助。
提问指南
+ 问题描述
写下详细的问题描述,包括所有有助于他人回答您问题的信息(例如实验过程、条件和相关图像等)。
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link




