Welcome guest, Login | Register

Home

X
加载中

During cellular respiration, nutrients are oxidized to generate energy through a mechanism called oxidative phosphorylation, which occurs in the mitochondria. During oxidative phosphorylation, the gradual degradation of molecules through the TCA cycle releases electrons from the covalent bonds that are broken. These electrons are captured by NAD+ through its reduction into NADH. Finally, NADH transports the electrons to the complexes of the electron chain in the internal membrane of mitochondria. These complexes use the energy released by the electrons to pump protons into the intermembrane space, generating an electrochemical gradient across the internal membrane of mitochondria, which provides energy for the ATP-synthase complex, ultimately producing adenosine triphosphate (ATP). We assessed the mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm) using tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM), a cell-permeant, cationic, red fluorescent dye. To measure specifically the mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm) we quantified the fluorescence intensity before and after applying FCCP, a mitochondrial electron chain uncoupler. The difference of intensity before and after applying FCCP corresponds specifically to the mitochondrial membrane potential. We analyzed mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm) by cytofluorimetry. The ratio between the total level of signal and the signal generated after uncoupling provided a normalized value for the difference in cell size. Furthermore, to normalize for the different size of cells that we were analyzing we have analyzed TMRM in live imaging using IN Cell Analyzer, so that the level of mitochondrial membrane potential could be detected per unit of mitochondrial membrane area measured. Thus, our protocol can also be used to compare the mitochondrial membrane potential of cells that are different in size.

Thanks for your further question/comment. It has been sent to the author(s) of this protocol. You will receive a notification once your question/comment is addressed again by the author(s).
Meanwhile, it would be great if you could help us to spread the word about Bio-protocol.

X

Mitochondrial Transmembrane Potential (ψm) Assay Using TMRM

Cell Biology > Cell signaling > Respiration
Authors: Isaline Rowe
Isaline RoweAffiliation: Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
Bio-protocol author page: a1050
 and Alessandra Boletta
Alessandra BolettaAffiliation: Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
For correspondence: boletta.alessandra@hsr.it
Bio-protocol author page: a1051
Vol 3, Iss 23, 12/5/2013, 8004 views, 0 Q&A, How to cite
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.987

[Abstract] During cellular respiration, nutrients are oxidized to generate energy through a mechanism called oxidative phosphorylation, which occurs in the mitochondria. During oxidative phosphorylation, the gradual degradation of molecules through the TCA cycle releases electrons from the covalent bonds that are broken. These electrons are captured by NAD+ through its reduction into NADH. Finally, NADH transports the electrons to the complexes of the electron chain in the internal membrane of mitochondria. These complexes use the energy released by the electrons to pump protons into the intermembrane space, generating an electrochemical gradient across the internal membrane of mitochondria, which provides energy for the ATP-synthase complex, ultimately producing adenosine triphosphate (ATP). We assessed the mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm) using tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM), a cell-permeant, cationic, red fluorescent dye. To measure specifically the mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm) we quantified the fluorescence intensity before and after applying FCCP, a mitochondrial electron chain uncoupler. The difference of intensity before and after applying FCCP corresponds specifically to the mitochondrial membrane potential. We analyzed mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm) by cytofluorimetry. The ratio between the total level of signal and the signal generated after uncoupling provided a normalized value for the difference in cell size. Furthermore, to normalize for the different size of cells that we were analyzing we have analyzed TMRM in live imaging using IN Cell Analyzer, so that the level of mitochondrial membrane potential could be detected per unit of mitochondrial membrane area measured. Thus, our protocol can also be used to compare the mitochondrial membrane potential of cells that are different in size.

Materials and Reagents

  1. Murine Embrionic Fbroblasts (MEF)
  2. Phenol-red free HBSS (Gibco®, catalog number:14175-079)
  3. 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) (Gibco®, catalog number: 15630-080)
  4. Tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) (Life Technologies, catalog number: T668)
  5. Cyclosporin H (Enzo Life Sciences, catalog number: ALX-380-286-M001)
  6. Hoechst 33342
  7. Carbonylcyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenyl hydrazone FCCP (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: C2920-10MG)
  8. Trypsin (451) - Trypsin, 0.05% (1X) with 0.53 mM EDTA 4Na, liquid, 20 x 100 ml
    (Gibco®, catalog number: 25300096)

Equipment

  1. IN Cell Analyzer 1000 (General Electric Company)
  2. 37 °C 5% CO2 Cell culture incubator
  3. 12 well pates (Corning, Costar®, catalog number: CLS 3513)
  4. FACScan (BD)
  5. Centrifuge spinning speed: 15,682,186 x g (G-force) (13,000 rpm, 8,3 cm radius)

Software

  1. IN Cell Investigator Analysis software (General Electric Company)
  2. BD CellQuest software
  3. FlowJo software

Procedure

  1. For quantitative real-time analysis
    1. Cells are plated at 50% cell confluence.
    2. Cells are incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in phenol-red free HBSS with 10 mM HEPES, 20 nM TMRM, 2 μM cyclosporine-H, inhibitor of multidrug resistance pump activity but not of the permeability transition pore (multi drug resistance pump activity can affect the mitochondrial lloading with TMRM) and 2 μg/ml Hoechst 33342, nuclear dye that can be used in living cells.
    3. Sequential images were taken before (3 time points) and after 4 μM FCCP (3 time points) was injected in a motorized way for TMRM (535 nm excitation filter; 600 nm emission) and Hoechst 33342 (360 nm excitation filter; 460 nm emission) in different fields (4 fields acquired for each well and 6 wells for each experimental condition) every 3 min with an IN CELL Analyzer 1000.
    4. Images are automatically analyzed with IN Cell Investigator Analysis software to measure the TMRM intensity. Fluorescence intensity is measured on the average of 10 points randomly selected for each field at the first and the last time point, the background corresponding to an area without cell is removed for each field.
    5. The fluorescence intensity measured at the last time point (after applying FCCP) is normalized by the fluorescence intensity measured at the first time point of the experiment.

  2. For FACS analysis
    1. Cells are plated at 50% confluence.
    2. Cells are trypsinized (at least 2 millions of cells).
    3. Cells are centrifuged for 5 min at G-force 13,62.
    4. Cells are washed in PBS, resuspended in phenol-red free HBSS with 10 mM HEPES and counted.
    5. Cells (300,000 cells per tube, each condition done in triplicate) are resuspended the in phenol-red free HBSS with 10 mM HEPES and 20 nM TMRM in the presence of 2 μM of the multidrug resistance pump inhibitor cyclosporine-H and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. In parallel, cells are incubated 5 min in the same conditions with an uncoupling agent, 4 μM FCCP, to measure the specific mitochondria staining.
    6. FACS analysis for TMRM was performed on BD FACScan with CellQuest software and analysed using FlowJo software. Fluorescence intensity of TMRM was calculated by gating on live cells.
    7. The intensity of the fluorescence with FCCP was normalized by the intensity without FCCP in order to rule out the possibility that the difference of the intensity is only or mainly caused by the cell sizes.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the co-authors of the article: Chiaravalli, M., Mannella, V., Ulisse, V., Quilici, G., Pema, M., Song, X. W., Xu, H.,  Mari, S., Qian, F., Pei, Y. and Musco, G., the other members of the lab Boletta, Casari, G. and Cassina, L. and the San Raffaele microscopy facility (Alembic).

References

  1. Rowe, I., Chiaravalli, M., Mannella, V., Ulisse, V., Quilici, G., Pema, M., Song, X. W., Xu, H., Mari, S., Qian, F., Pei, Y., Musco, G. and Boletta, A. (2013). Defective glucose metabolism in polycystic kidney disease identifies a new therapeutic strategy. Nat Med 19(4): 488-493.


How to cite this protocol: Rowe, I. and Boletta, A. (2013). Mitochondrial Transmembrane Potential (ψm) Assay Using TMRM. Bio-protocol 3(23): e987. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.987; Full Text



Reproducibility Feedback:

  • Add Photo
  • Add Video

Bio-protocol's major goal is to make reproducing an experiment an easier task. If you have used this protocol, it would be great if you could share your experience by leaving some comments, uploading images or even sharing some videos. Please login to post your feedback.

Q&A and Troubleshooting:

  • Add Photo
  • Add Video

Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol.
You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.


Login | Register
Share
Twitter Twitter
LinkedIn LinkedIn
Google+ Google+
Facebook Facebook
Other protocols by Isaline Rowe(1)
Other protocols by Alessandra Boletta(1)