Welcome guest, Sign in
Home
Organisms store carbohydrates in several forms. In yeast, carbohydrates are stored in glycogen (a multi-branched polysaccharide) and in trehalose (a disaccharide). As in other organisms, the amount of stored carbohydrate varies dramatically with physiological state, and accordingly, an assay of stored carbohydrate can help reveal physiological state. Here, we describe relatively easy and streamlined assays for glycogen and trehalose in yeast that can be applied either to a few samples, or in a moderately high-throughput fashion (dozens to hundreds of samples).
Thanks for your further question/comment. It has been sent to the author(s) of this protocol. You will receive a notification once your question/comment is addressed again by the author(s). Meanwhile, it would be great if you could help us to spread the word about Bio-protocol.
[Abstract] Organisms store carbohydrates in several forms. In yeast, carbohydrates are stored in glycogen (a multi-branched polysaccharide) and in trehalose (a disaccharide). As in other organisms, the amount of stored carbohydrate varies dramatically with physiological state, and accordingly, an assay of stored carbohydrate can help reveal physiological state. Here, we describe relatively easy and streamlined assays for glycogen and trehalose in yeast that can be applied either to a few samples, or in a moderately high-throughput fashion (dozens to hundreds of samples).
Keywords: Glycogen, Trehalose, Yeast, Storage carbohydrate, Cell cycle
[Background] Glycogen and trehalose are the two storage carbohydrates of yeast and many other organisms. In yeast, both these storage carbohydrates accumulate when the medium starts to be depleted and the rate of cell growth decreases. Methods for assaying storage carbohydrates in yeast date back at least to 1956 (Trevelyan and Harrison, 1956a and 1956b), and have been updated many times since (e.g., [Becker, 1978; Quain, 1981; Schulze et al., 1995; Parrou and Francois, 1997; Plata et al., 2013], among others). There are three basic steps in assaying these two storage carbohydrates: first, lysing or permeabilizing the cells; second, freeing glucose from the glycogen or trehalose; and third, assaying the resulting glucose. Cells can be lysed mechanically (Schulze et al., 1995), but this is inevitably somewhat tedious and time-consuming, and tends to require larger numbers of cells. Cells can be permeabilized by alkali, but glycogen forms large, multi-branched granules, and can be difficult to extract, and so some protocols use both an alkali and an acid extraction (Trevelyan and Harrison, 1956a and 1956b; Quain, 1981). However, alkali treatment alone extracts the vast majority of the glycogen (and probably all of the trehalose) (Becker, 1978; Quain, 1981; Parrou and Francois, 1997); and it may allow enzymes such as amyloglucosidase access to the interior of the permeabilized cell, where it can liberate glucose from any residual glycogen, and alkali extraction alone is much easier than a dual alkali/acid extraction. Therefore, like Becker, and Parrou and Francois, we use only an alkali extraction. However, it is possible that this may fail to assay a relatively small amount of acid-extractable glycogen (Quain, 1981). In older assays (e.g., [Trevelyan and Harrison, 1956a and 1956b]), glucose was released and/or assayed by purely chemical methods. However, these were relatively non-specific, and also assayed glucose present in other molecules, such as cell wall glucans. Therefore more modern methods use enzymes to liberate glucose from specific polysaccharides; e.g., amyloglucosidases are used to liberate glucose from glycogen (Becker, 1978), and trehalases are used to liberate glucose from trehalose (Parrou and Francois, 1997). A challenge to these methods is that some enzymes are contaminated with other activities. For instance, Parrou and Francois found that some amyloglucosidases were contaminated with trehalases. Therefore either purer enzymes need to be used, or less pure enzymes need to be used under conditions that inhibit the unwanted activities. Here, like Parrou and Francois, we use Aspergillus niger α-amyloglucosidase, which may also contain a trehalase activity (Parrou and Francois, 1997), depending on the specific preparation of enzyme, but we use it at high temperature (55 °C to 57 °C), approximately the optimum temperature for this enzyme, where the trehalase is inactive (Parrou and Francois, 1997). Finally, the enzymatically-released glucose must be assayed. There are many well-developed assays for glucose. We use the glucose oxidase/peroxidase/o-dianisidine reagent of the Sigma-Aldrich glucose oxidase kit, which produces oxidized o-dianisidine, which has a pink/purple color, easily assayed by absorbance at 540 nm. Our procedure is adapted from that of Parrou and Francois (1997). However, at most steps, we use smaller volumes of reagents, which make the assay easier in some respects. The small volumes allow us to adapt the procedure to 96-well microtitre dishes, which allows the assay to become moderately high-throughput. We give two procedures, one for 2 ml screw-capped tubes, and one for 96-well microtitre dishes.
Materials and Reagents
Note: *Reagents from any qualified company are suitable for this experiment.
Equipment
Note: All those items can be ordered from any qualified company.
Procedure
Data analysis
Linear regression is used to fit a line to the linear part of the standard curve; points in the non-linear range (the higher glucose amounts) are not used in this analysis. The linear regression line is used to convert readings from samples into absolute amounts of glucose. From knowledge of the number of cells in the original sample (here, either 5 x 107 or 1 x 108), and knowledge of the fraction of the sample used in the final color assay (for the 2 ml tube glycogen assay, 50/260 = 0.192), the amount of carbohydrate per cell can be calculated in ng or pg of glucose-equivalents. Two key points for the analysis are accurate knowledge of the number of cells in the starting sample; and use of measurements within the linear range.
Notes
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by NIH RO1 GM 119175.
References
Bio-protocol's major goal is to make reproducing an experiment an easier task. If you have used this protocol, it would be great if you could share your experience by leaving some comments, uploading images or even sharing some videos. Please login to post your feedback.
Login | Register
View Original Delete
Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol. You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.