Welcome guest, Login | Register

Home

X
加载中

The DNA molecule is exposed to a multitude of damaging agents that can compromise its integrity: single (SSB) and double strand breaks (DSB), intra- or inter-strand crosslinks, base loss or modification, etc. Many different DNA repair pathways coexist in the cell to ensure the stability of the DNA molecule. The nature of the DNA lesion will determine which set of proteins are needed to reconstitute the intact double stranded DNA molecule. Multiple and sequential enzymatic activities are required and the proteins responsible for those activities not only need to find the lesion to be repaired among the millions and millions of intact base pairs that form the genomic DNA but their activities have to be orchestrated to avoid the accumulation of toxic repair intermediates. For example in the repair of Single Strand Breaks (SSB) the proteins PARP1, XRCC1, Polymerase Beta and Ligase III will be required and their activities coordinated to ensure the correct repair of the damage.
Furthermore, the DNA is not free in the nucleus but organized in the chromatin with different compaction levels. DNA repair proteins have therefore to deal with this nuclear organization to ensure an efficient DNA repair. A way to study the distribution of DNA repair proteins in the nucleus after damage induction is the use of the laser microirradiation with which a particular type of DNA damage can be induced in a localized region of the cell nucleus. The wavelength and the intensity of the laser used will determine the predominant type of damage that is induced. It is important to note that other lesions can also be generated at the microirradiated site.
Living cells transfected with the fluorescent protein XRCC1-GFP are micro-irradiated under a confocal microscope and the kinetics of recruitment of the fluorescent protein is followed during 1 min. In our protocol the 405 nm laser is used to induce SSB.

Thanks for your further question/comment. It has been sent to the author(s) of this protocol. You will receive a notification once your question/comment is addressed again by the author(s).
Meanwhile, it would be great if you could help us to spread the word about Bio-protocol.

X

Laser Microirradiation and Temporal Analysis of XRCC1 Recruitment to Single-strand DNA Breaks

Cancer Biology > General technique > Genetics > DNA damage
Authors: Anna Campalans
Anna CampalansAffiliation 1: CEA, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology, Fontenay aux Roses, France
Affiliation 2: Université Paris Diderot, Fontenay aux Roses, France
Affiliation 3: Université Paris Sud, Fontenay aux Roses, France
For correspondence: anna.campalans@cea.fr
Bio-protocol author page: a2943
 and J. Pablo Radicella
J. Pablo RadicellaAffiliation 1: CEA, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology, Fontenay aux Roses, France
Affiliation 2: Université Paris Diderot, Fontenay aux Roses, France
Affiliation 3: Université Paris Sud, Fontenay aux Roses, France
For correspondence: pablo.radicella@cea.fr
Bio-protocol author page: a2944
Vol 6, Iss 5, 3/5/2016, 882 views, 0 Q&A, How to cite
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.1746

[Abstract] The DNA molecule is exposed to a multitude of damaging agents that can compromise its integrity: single (SSB) and double strand breaks (DSB), intra- or inter-strand crosslinks, base loss or modification, etc. Many different DNA repair pathways coexist in the cell to ensure the stability of the DNA molecule. The nature of the DNA lesion will determine which set of proteins are needed to reconstitute the intact double stranded DNA molecule. Multiple and sequential enzymatic activities are required and the proteins responsible for those activities not only need to find the lesion to be repaired among the millions and millions of intact base pairs that form the genomic DNA but their activities have to be orchestrated to avoid the accumulation of toxic repair intermediates. For example in the repair of Single Strand Breaks (SSB) the proteins PARP1, XRCC1, Polymerase Beta and Ligase III will be required and their activities coordinated to ensure the correct repair of the damage.
Furthermore, the DNA is not free in the nucleus but organized in the chromatin with different compaction levels. DNA repair proteins have therefore to deal with this nuclear organization to ensure an efficient DNA repair. A way to study the distribution of DNA repair proteins in the nucleus after damage induction is the use of the laser microirradiation with which a particular type of DNA damage can be induced in a localized region of the cell nucleus. The wavelength and the intensity of the laser used will determine the predominant type of damage that is induced. It is important to note that other lesions can also be generated at the microirradiated site.
Living cells transfected with the fluorescent protein XRCC1-GFP are micro-irradiated under a confocal microscope and the kinetics of recruitment of the fluorescent protein is followed during 1 min. In our protocol the 405 nm laser is used to induce SSB.

Keywords: DNA damage, Single-strand DNA breaks, DNA repair, Microirradiation, Live imaging

Materials and Reagents

  1. Glass bottom 35 mm petri dishes (MatTek, catalog number: P35G-1.5-20-C)
  2. HeLa adherent cells in culture
  3. Plasmids coding for the fluorescent protein XRCC1-GFP
    Note: The XRCC1 sequence (NCBI P18887) was cloned in the Clontech pEGFP-N1 Vector at the restriction sites EcoRI/ApaI.
  4. Transfection agents (LipoFectamine 2000) (Life Technologies, catalog number: 11668027)
    Note: Currently, it is “Thermo Fisher Scientific, Invitrogen™, catalog number: 11668027”.
  5. DMEM [DMEM(1x) + GlutaMAX™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Gibco™, catalog number: 31966-021)] containing 10% of fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Gibco™, catalog number: 16000-044)

Equipment

  1. Cell incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, model: NAPCO 5400)
    Note: Currently, it is “BioSurplus, catalog number: NAPCO 5400”.
  2. Nikon A1 inverted confocal microscope equipped with an environmental chamber allowing the control of temperature, humidity and gas mixture
    Note: The lasers used are the following: 405 nm laser for the micro-irradiation, and a 488 nm Argon-laser to visualize the GFP fluorescence. The objective 63x was used.

Software

  1. The NIS Software
    Note: It was used for quantification of the fluorescence intensity at the microirradiation region during time, using the Time Measurement function.

Procedure

  1. HeLa cells were seeded in 35 mm glass bottom petri dishes (250,000 cells per dish) and transfected 24 h later with the XRCC1-GFP plasmid using lipofectamine 2000 according to manufacturer recommendations.
  2. 24 h after transfection, microirradiation was carried out with a 405 nm diode laser set to 5% power. The laser power at the exit of the fiber was of 4 mW, and around 1 mW watts at the exit of the 10x Obj.
  3. Measurements were performed by immobilizing the laser at 100% in a point bleach with the Digital Handheld Optical Power PM100D from THORLABS.
    1. Stimulation and acquisition were performed with the 60x objective at a zoom of 4 using an image size of 512 x 512.
    2. A stimulation line of 5 µm was defined and microirradiation performed for 6 sec. Six images were taken before micro-irradiation to calculate the basal level of fluorescence. After micro- irradiation, an image was taken every 2 sec during 1 min.
    3. Between 10 and 20 cells are micro-irradiated in each experiment.
    Note: To determine the intensity of the lasers to be used in each different microscope it may be useful to monitor the recruitment of proteins involved in Single Strand Break Repair (SSBR) such as XRCC1 and proteins involved in the repair of Double Strand Breaks (DSBR), such as 53BP1 or NBS1 and keep the conditions that induce recruitment of XRCC1 but not of the DSBR proteins. In our case, only after addition of the DNA intercalant Hoechst 33342 we could observe the recruitment of DSBR proteins so we could validate that in our conditions we were mainly inducing SSB.

Analysis and quantification

  1. The fluorescence intensity at the micro-irradiated region is measured for each time point. Six images are taken before the micro-irradiation in order to quantify a mean of fluorescence that will be considered as the basal level of the protein in the region and used to normalize the measurements (this value is set to 1).
  2. In order to quantify the enrichment factor of XRCC1 in the micro-irradiation region the intensity observed for each time point is divided by the mean intensity measured before the micro-irradiation.
  3. The mean of at least 10 cells is displayed in the graph. Error bars represent the SEM.
  4. It is important to check if there is bleaching during the acquisition process and correct for that if necessary. In order to do that we define a Standard Region of Interest (ROI-2) in another cell expressing similar amounts of XRCC1-GFP that is in the same scan area. Fluorescence intensity is monitored both in the micro-irradiated cell and in the non micro-irradiated one during both the stimulation and the acquisition period. If there is bleaching we will observe a decrease in the fluorescence in the non micro-irradiated cell. It was not the case in our system so no further corrections were required. If bleaching is observed, it is recommended to adjust the acquisition conditions in order to reduce that problem.

Representative data


Figure 1. HeLa cell expressing the XRCC1-GFP or the mutant protein XRCC1(L360D) were microirradiated with a 405 nm laser. A) Presented images correspond to the cell before microirradiation and 1 min after microirradiation. The microirradiation region is indicated by a dashed line. The mutant protein XRCC1(L360D), that has not any more the ability to be recruited to SSB was used as a control. B) Fluorescence intensity corresponding to XRCC1-GFP at the microirradiated region was quantified and displayed in the graph. Error bars represent the SEM of 10 independent cells.

Video 1. HeLa cell expressing the XRCC1-GFP protein was microirradiated with a 405 nm laser

To play the video, you need to install a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash Player


Acknowledgments

We thank the IRCM microscopy facility. This work was funded by INSERM and grants from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (PJA 20131200165) and the CEA Radiobiology program.

References

  1. Campalans, A., Kortulewski, T., Amouroux, R., Menoni, H., Vermeulen, W. and Radicella, J. P. (2013). Distinct spatiotemporal patterns and PARP dependence of XRCC1 recruitment to single-strand break and base excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res 41(5): 3115-3129.


How to cite this protocol: Campalans, A. and Radicella, J. P. (2016). Laser Microirradiation and Temporal Analysis of XRCC1 Recruitment to Single-strand DNA Breaks. Bio-protocol 6(5): e1746. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1746; Full Text



Reproducibility Feedback:

  • Add Photo
  • Add Video

Bio-protocol's major goal is to make reproducing an experiment an easier task. If you have used this protocol, it would be great if you could share your experience by leaving some comments, uploading images or even sharing some videos. Please login to post your feedback.

Q&A and Troubleshooting:

  • Add Photo
  • Add Video

Please login to post your questions/comments. Your questions will be directed to the authors of the protocol. The authors will be requested to answer your questions at their earliest convenience. Once your questions are answered, you will be informed using the email address that you register with bio-protocol.
You are highly recommended to post your data (images or even videos) for the troubleshooting. For uploading videos, you may need a Google account because Bio-protocol uses YouTube to host videos.


Login | Register
Share
Twitter Twitter
LinkedIn LinkedIn
Google+ Google+
Facebook Facebook